Bug#800392: [Python-modules-team] Bug#800392: Bug#800392: Bug#800392: python-numpy: FTBFS on powerpc due to test failure

2015-10-02 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
On 02/10/15 07:49, Sandro Tosi wrote: > On Thu, Oct 1, 2015 at 11:24 PM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort > wrote: >> numpy/core/src/multiarray/lowlevel_strided_loops.c.src:10:15: warning: extra >> tokens at end of #ifdef directive >> #ifdef defined(__ppc__) || defined(__powerpc__) || defined(_ARCH_PPC) >>

Bug#800392: [Python-modules-team] Bug#800392: Bug#800392: Bug#800392: python-numpy: FTBFS on powerpc due to test failure

2015-10-01 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
On 02/10/15 00:05, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > On Thu, 1 Oct 2015 21:13:04 +0100 Sandro Tosi wrote: >>> those certainly should work, forgot about them. >>> you should be able to login to a powerpc porterbox and check. >>> cat test.c >>> __POWERPC__ >>> gcc -E test.c >> >> i tried with somethin

Bug#800392: [Python-modules-team] Bug#800392: Bug#800392: Bug#800392: python-numpy: FTBFS on powerpc due to test failure

2015-10-01 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
On Thu, 1 Oct 2015 21:13:04 +0100 Sandro Tosi wrote: > > those certainly should work, forgot about them. > > you should be able to login to a powerpc porterbox and check. > > cat test.c > > __POWERPC__ > > gcc -E test.c > > i tried with something like this: > > $ cat t.c > #ifdef __POWERPC__ > #

Bug#800392: [Python-modules-team] Bug#800392: Bug#800392: Bug#800392: python-numpy: FTBFS on powerpc due to test failure

2015-10-01 Thread Sandro Tosi
> those certainly should work, forgot about them. > you should be able to login to a powerpc porterbox and check. > cat test.c > __POWERPC__ > gcc -E test.c i tried with something like this: $ cat t.c #ifdef __POWERPC__ #ifndef NDEBUG // disable asserts malloc broken // https://sourceware.org/bug

Bug#800392: [Python-modules-team] Bug#800392: Bug#800392: Bug#800392: python-numpy: FTBFS on powerpc due to test failure

2015-09-30 Thread Julian Taylor
On 01.10.2015 00:41, Sandro Tosi wrote: > On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 11:19 PM, Julian Taylor > wrote: >> hm is __POWERPC__ not the right macro for that platform? that should >> have worked > > in numpy/core/include/numpy/npy_cpu.h i can find > > #elif defined(__ppc__) || defined(__powerpc__) || def

Bug#800392: [Python-modules-team] Bug#800392: Bug#800392: Bug#800392: python-numpy: FTBFS on powerpc due to test failure

2015-09-30 Thread Sandro Tosi
On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 11:19 PM, Julian Taylor wrote: > hm is __POWERPC__ not the right macro for that platform? that should > have worked in numpy/core/include/numpy/npy_cpu.h i can find #elif defined(__ppc__) || defined(__powerpc__) || defined(_ARCH_PPC) /* * __ppc__ is defined by gc

Bug#800392: [Python-modules-team] Bug#800392: Bug#800392: python-numpy: FTBFS on powerpc due to test failure

2015-09-30 Thread Julian Taylor
On 01.10.2015 00:17, Sandro Tosi wrote: > control: reopen -1 > >>> it would probably be best to disable the assert in >>> lowlevel_strided_loops.c.src on powerpc depending cpp macros, that way >>> it will also continue to work when users would want to use python-dbg on >>> ppc if softfaulting is e

Bug#800392: [Python-modules-team] Bug#800392: Bug#800392: python-numpy: FTBFS on powerpc due to test failure

2015-09-30 Thread Sandro Tosi
control: reopen -1 >> it would probably be best to disable the assert in >> lowlevel_strided_loops.c.src on powerpc depending cpp macros, that way >> it will also continue to work when users would want to use python-dbg on >> ppc if softfaulting is enabled. >> > > attached a patch Sadly it didnt

Bug#800392: [Python-modules-team] Bug#800392: Bug#800392: Bug#800392: python-numpy: FTBFS on powerpc due to test failure

2015-09-29 Thread Scott Kitterman
On Wednesday, September 30, 2015 01:22:51 AM Julian Taylor wrote: > On 30.09.2015 01:14, Julian Taylor wrote: > > On 30.09.2015 01:01, Sandro Tosi wrote: > >> On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 8:05 AM, Julian Taylor > >> > >> Is there an elegant way to instruct numpy testsuite to just ignore > >> errors on

Bug#800392: [Python-modules-team] Bug#800392: Bug#800392: python-numpy: FTBFS on powerpc due to test failure

2015-09-29 Thread Julian Taylor
On 30.09.2015 01:14, Julian Taylor wrote: > On 30.09.2015 01:01, Sandro Tosi wrote: >> On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 8:05 AM, Julian Taylor >> Is there an elegant way to instruct numpy testsuite to just ignore >> errors on powerpc? I would really love to keep the test failures as >> blocking on all Debi

Bug#800392: [Python-modules-team] Bug#800392: Bug#800392: python-numpy: FTBFS on powerpc due to test failure

2015-09-29 Thread Julian Taylor
On 30.09.2015 01:01, Sandro Tosi wrote: > On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 8:05 AM, Julian Taylor > wrote: >> On 28.09.2015 20:58, Scott Kitterman wrote: >>> >>> Seems like this may be related to #702169. >>> >> >> no, powerpc is the arch with the broken malloc: >> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.

Bug#800392: [Python-modules-team] Bug#800392: Bug#800392: python-numpy: FTBFS on powerpc due to test failure

2015-09-29 Thread Sandro Tosi
On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 8:05 AM, Julian Taylor wrote: > On 28.09.2015 20:58, Scott Kitterman wrote: >> >> Seems like this may be related to #702169. >> > > no, powerpc is the arch with the broken malloc: > https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6527 > > the test should probably just be ig

Bug#800392: [Python-modules-team] Bug#800392: python-numpy: FTBFS on powerpc due to test failure

2015-09-29 Thread Scott Kitterman
OK. Can you prepare an upload? This is blocking the python3.5 transition, so I would like to see it resolved quickly. Scott K On September 29, 2015 3:05:18 AM EDT, Julian Taylor wrote: >On 28.09.2015 20:58, Scott Kitterman wrote: >> >> Seems like this may be related to #702169. >> > >no, po

Bug#800392: [Python-modules-team] Bug#800392: python-numpy: FTBFS on powerpc due to test failure

2015-09-29 Thread Julian Taylor
On 28.09.2015 20:58, Scott Kitterman wrote: > > Seems like this may be related to #702169. > no, powerpc is the arch with the broken malloc: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6527 the test should probably just be ignored (as it has been in the past) it has always been broken and n

Bug#800392: python-numpy: FTBFS on powerpc due to test failure

2015-09-28 Thread Scott Kitterman
Source: python-numpy Version: 1:1.9.2-2 Severity: serious Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past) Here's the build-log excerpt: test_basic (test_multiarray.TestChoose) ... ok test_broadcast1 (test_multiarray.TestChoose) ... ok test_broadcast2 (test_multiarra