On 09/02/2015 07:59 PM, Andy Grover wrote:
> On 09/02/2015 01:03 AM, Thomas Goirand wrote:
>> Ok, so basically, I have nothing to do, but to package the last version
>> of rtslib-fb. Am I right? If so, then I'll package rtslib-fb ASAP in
>> Debian Experimental. Please let me know if the new version
On 09/02/2015 01:03 AM, Thomas Goirand wrote:
Ok, so basically, I have nothing to do, but to package the last version
of rtslib-fb. Am I right? If so, then I'll package rtslib-fb ASAP in
Debian Experimental. Please let me know if the new version would also
work with Kilo (in which case, I'd uploa
On 09/01/2015 05:03 PM, Andy Grover wrote:
> On 09/01/2015 04:41 AM, Thomas Goirand wrote:
>> Hi Andy,
>>
>> How do you propose that I do what you suggested (ie: package rtslib-fb
>> with both names available)? Isn't this something you should work out
>> yourself, as an upstream?
>>
>> BTW, thanks
On 09/01/2015 04:41 AM, Thomas Goirand wrote:
Hi Andy,
How do you propose that I do what you suggested (ie: package rtslib-fb
with both names available)? Isn't this something you should work out
yourself, as an upstream?
BTW, thanks for solving this conflict. With my package maintainer hat
on,
Hi Andy,
How do you propose that I do what you suggested (ie: package rtslib-fb
with both names available)? Isn't this something you should work out
yourself, as an upstream?
BTW, thanks for solving this conflict. With my package maintainer hat
on, this is very much appreciated.
Cheers,
Thomas
Package: python-rtslib-fb
Version: 2.1.45-4
Severity: normal
Tags: newcomer
Dear Maintainer,
I am the upstream maintainer for rtslib-fb.
In order to facilitate parallel installation of both versions of rtslib, the
original RTS/Datera version as well as rtslib-fb, rtslib-fb is changing its
module
6 matches
Mail list logo
