On 2015-08-24 23:48, Michael Biebl wrote:
> Hi Niels,
>
> [...]
>
> Shouldn't this bug be filed against ftp-master then, since sections
> can't be changed via debian/control, which you certainly know?
>
>
> Michael
>
Normally yes. However, in the given case, DAK actually uses the raw
field f
On 24/08/15 22:48, Michael Biebl wrote:
> Shouldn't this bug be filed against ftp-master then, since sections
> can't be changed via debian/control, which you certainly know?
I said the same on #debian-devel, and actually the answer seems to be no:
< nthykier> smcv: Except their current patch use
Hi Niels,
Am 24.08.2015 um 23:24 schrieb Niels Thykier:
> Control: retitle -1 libglib2.0-0-refdbg: Please change section to devel
>
> On 2015-08-24 23:16, Simon McVittie wrote:
>> On 24/08/15 22:04, Niels Thykier wrote:
>>> Please consider moving libglib2.0-0-refdbg to a different section.
>>
>>
Control: retitle -1 libglib2.0-0-refdbg: Please change section to devel
On 2015-08-24 23:16, Simon McVittie wrote:
> On 24/08/15 22:04, Niels Thykier wrote:
>> Please consider moving libglib2.0-0-refdbg to a different section.
>
> devel seems a little less inappropriate than misc, perhaps?
>
>
On 24/08/15 22:04, Niels Thykier wrote:
> Please consider moving libglib2.0-0-refdbg to a different section.
devel seems a little less inappropriate than misc, perhaps?
Some other packages similar to libglib2.0-0-refdbg:
* python2.7-dbg (and other versions) are the Python interpreter
and stand
Package: libglib2.0-0-refdbg
Severity: wishlist
Usertags: ddeb-support
Hi,
Please consider moving libglib2.0-0-refdbg to a different section.
To better support ddebs, the FTP masters have decided to implement a
change in DAK that will make DAK move *all* packages in the debug
section into a sepa
6 matches
Mail list logo
