Bug#796293: insufficient/confusing documentation for pgpsigurlmangle

2015-08-21 Thread Daniel Kahn Gillmor
Hi Thomas-- Thanks for the useful feedback. The documentation tries to be short but complete, and clearly we have a ways to go for improvement. I'll answer your questions below -- maybe you can propose a patch that would make these answers clearer without bloating or overcomplicating uscan(1) ?

Bug#796293: insufficient/confusing documentation for pgpsigurlmangle

2015-08-21 Thread Mattia Rizzolo
Control: notfound -1 2.15.8~bpo8+1 Control: found -1 2.15.8 Control: severity -1 wishlist Control: clone -1 -2 -3 Control: reassign -2 lintian 2.5.36 Control: retitle -2 please suggest debian/upstream/signing-key.{asc,pgp} instead of debian/upstream-signing-key.asc for the debian-watch-may-check-

Bug#796293: insufficient/confusing documentation for pgpsigurlmangle

2015-08-21 Thread Thomas Koch
Package: devscripts Version: 2.15.8~bpo8+1 Severity: normal -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 There are a few related shortcomings with the documentation of pgpsigurlmangle and the related lintian tag debian-watch-may-check-gpg-signature. 1) The uscan manpage says: "This signature