On Tuesday, 11 August 2015 22:12:46 AEDT you wrote:
> On Tue, 11 Aug 2015, Ari Pollak wrote:
> > It is not sufficient to create such a copyright file while
> > building the binary package.
> >
> > Since when? The part of policy you quoted says the copyright file
> > should be in debian
On Tue, 11 Aug 2015, Ari Pollak wrote:
It is not sufficient to create such a copyright file while
building the binary package.
Since when? The part of policy you quoted says the copyright file should be in
debian/copyright, not must.
Sorry, but I don't know the exact history
https://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#severities
> serious
> is a severe violation of Debian policy (roughly, it violates a must or
> required directive), or, in the package maintainer's or release manager's
> opinion, makes the package unsuitable for release.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debi
>
> It is not sufficient to create such a copyright file while
> building the binary package.
>
Since when? The part of policy you quoted says the copyright file *should* be
in debian/copyright, not *must*.
Package: pidgin
Version: 2.10.11-1
Severity: serious
User: alteh...@debian.org
Usertags: no-debian-copyright
X-Debbugs-CC: ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org
thanks
Dear Maintainer,
there seems to be no file debian/copyright in your package.
According to Debian policy 12.5 [1]:
A copy of the fi
5 matches
Mail list logo
