Bug#794736: libvigraimpex: library transition is needed when GCC 5 is the default

2015-10-01 Thread Daniel Stender
Control: tags -1 - pending Removing tag pending like Emilio did it for #753044. DS -- 4096R/DF5182C8 46CB 1CA8 9EA3 B743 7676 1DB9 15E0 9AF4 DF51 82C8 LPI certified Linux admin (LPI000329859 64mz6f7kt4) http://www.danielstender.com/blog/

Bug#794736: libvigraimpex: library transition is needed when GCC 5 is the default

2015-09-30 Thread Daniel Stender
The transition(s) of Vigra (1.10.0 and lib5v5) is just around the corner. We're checking the reverse-deps, all works/builds fine instead of current 3depict [1], and I've faced some problems with libreoffice ([2], also not related to libvigraimpex-dev, though). Yet little busy, but this is going to

Bug#794736: libvigraimpex: library transition is needed when GCC 5 is the default

2015-08-23 Thread Simon McVittie
On Thu, 13 Aug 2015 at 13:47:04 +0200, Daniel Stender wrote: > We have some other serious issues open for Vigra (with the Lenna image set > [2] and test suite > problems in Mips), so I suggest we do it that way: I'm going to prepare a > "v5" 1.9.0+dfsg-11 > for unstable in the next days and check

Bug#794736: libvigraimpex: library transition is needed when GCC 5 is the default

2015-08-13 Thread Daniel Stender
On 13.08.2015 19:31, Andreas Metzler wrote: >> We have some other serious issues open for Vigra (with the Lenna >> image set [2] and test suite problems in Mips), so I suggest we do >> it that way: I'm going to prepare a "v5" 1.9.0+dfsg-11 for unstable >> in the next days and check the reverse deps

Bug#794736: libvigraimpex: library transition is needed when GCC 5 is the default

2015-08-13 Thread Andreas Metzler
On 2015-08-13 Daniel Stender wrote: > We have a SONAME bump happening due to the Vigra 1.10.0 transition > [1] which generally could let spare a "v5" package when the two > transitions would be combined, isn't it? > However, I think it's better to adopt what has been already changed > for 1.10.0+

Bug#794736: libvigraimpex: library transition is needed when GCC 5 is the default

2015-08-13 Thread Daniel Stender
We have a SONAME bump happening due to the Vigra 1.10.0 transition [1] which generally could let spare a "v5" package when the two transitions would be combined, isn't it? However, I think it's better to adopt what has been already changed for 1.10.0+dfsg-9ubuntu1 to update Vigra for 15.10 (rena

Bug#794736: libvigraimpex: library transition is needed when GCC 5 is the default

2015-08-06 Thread Andreas Metzler
On 2015-08-06 Matthias Klose wrote: > Package: src:libvigraimpex > Version: 1.10.0+dfsg-9 > Severity: serious > Tags: sid stretch confirmed > User: debian-...@lists.debian.org > Usertags: libstdc++-cxx11 > [ confirmed, for both 1.10.0+dfsg-9 in experimental and 1.9.0+dfsg-10 in > unstable ] [...

Bug#794736: libvigraimpex: library transition is needed when GCC 5 is the default

2015-08-05 Thread Matthias Klose
Package: src:libvigraimpex Version: 1.10.0+dfsg-9 Severity: serious Tags: sid stretch confirmed User: debian-...@lists.debian.org Usertags: libstdc++-cxx11 [ confirmed, for both 1.10.0+dfsg-9 in experimental and 1.9.0+dfsg-10 in unstable ] Background [1]: libstdc++6 introduces a new ABI to conf