Package: pulseaudio
Version: 10.0-1+deb9u1
Followup-For: Bug #794692
Why does the API being unstable matter? Debian isn't going to move to the next
integer version of PulseAudio within a release. Please consider packaging this
or at the very least making the xrdp module a separate package for
s
On Fri, 28 Aug 2015, Felipe Sateler wrote:
> I don't see that module listed at the upstream patch review queue[1].
Urgh. This is *way* out of scope for me, xrdp packager hat.
> (Thinking out loud) maybe we could build a pulseaudio-src package...
This would have the precisely same effect as a pu
On 28 August 2015 at 07:18, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> On Wed, 5 Aug 2015, Felipe Sateler wrote:
>
>> Your best option is to get the pulseaudio source and add your module
>> as a patch.
>
> Would you be receptive for such a patch?
>
> We’re talking about this one:
>
> https://github.com/neutrinolabs
On Wed, 5 Aug 2015, Felipe Sateler wrote:
> Your best option is to get the pulseaudio source and add your module
> as a patch.
Would you be receptive for such a patch?
We’re talking about this one:
https://github.com/neutrinolabs/xrdp/tree/devel/sesman/chansrv/pulse
Having it a separate binary
Control: tags -1 wontfix
Hi Dominik,
On 5 August 2015 at 15:24, Dominik George wrote:
> Source: pulseaudio
> Severity: wishlist
>
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA256
>
> Please build a -dev package that contains headers for building
> pulseaduio modules against.
>
> This is neede
Source: pulseaudio
Severity: wishlist
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Please build a -dev package that contains headers for building
pulseaduio modules against.
This is needed in e.g. modern xrdp to build desktop audio forwarding
over RDP.
Thanks,
Nik
- --
PGP-Fingerprint: 3C9
6 matches
Mail list logo
