Bug#870987: Bug#814176: Bug#793492: Bug#814176: azureus: (Build-)Depends on OpenJDK 7

2018-02-02 Thread Scott Kitterman
On Thu, 31 Aug 2017 22:20:22 + Scott Kitterman wrote: > > > On August 31, 2017 1:28:40 PM EDT, Emmanuel Bourg wrote: > >Le 27/08/2017 à 00:07, Scott Kitterman a écrit : > > > >> I would like to give Emmanuel time to respond to this. I've tagged > >the bug > >> moreinfo to hold on on proc

Bug#870987: Bug#814176: Bug#793492: Bug#814176: azureus: (Build-)Depends on OpenJDK 7

2017-08-31 Thread Scott Kitterman
On August 31, 2017 1:28:40 PM EDT, Emmanuel Bourg wrote: >Le 27/08/2017 à 00:07, Scott Kitterman a écrit : > >> I would like to give Emmanuel time to respond to this. I've tagged >the bug >> moreinfo to hold on on processing it for the moment. If Emmanuel >agrees to >> the removal or we don'

Bug#870987: Bug#814176: Bug#793492: Bug#814176: azureus: (Build-)Depends on OpenJDK 7

2017-08-31 Thread Emmanuel Bourg
Le 27/08/2017 à 00:07, Scott Kitterman a écrit : > I would like to give Emmanuel time to respond to this. I've tagged the bug > moreinfo to hold on on processing it for the moment. If Emmanuel agrees to > the removal or we don't hear back in two weeks, then go ahead and remove the > moreinfo

Bug#870987: Bug#814176: Bug#793492: Bug#814176: azureus: (Build-)Depends on OpenJDK 7

2017-08-26 Thread Scott Kitterman
On Sun, 20 Aug 2017 22:12:29 +0200 Markus Koschany wrote: > reassign 870987 ftp.debian.org > retitle 870987 RM: azureus -- RoQA; missed both jessie and stretch > thanks > > Am 08.08.2017 um 20:08 schrieb Emmanuel Bourg: > > On 08/08/2017 06:44 PM, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote: > > > >> 1.5 years late

Bug#793492: Bug#814176: Bug#793492: Bug#814176: azureus: (Build-)Depends on OpenJDK 7

2017-08-20 Thread Markus Koschany
reassign 870987 ftp.debian.org retitle 870987 RM: azureus -- RoQA; missed both jessie and stretch thanks Am 08.08.2017 um 20:08 schrieb Emmanuel Bourg: > On 08/08/2017 06:44 PM, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote: > >> 1.5 years later this hasn't changed, shall we now drop it? > > Actually there has been a

Bug#814176: Bug#793492: Bug#814176: azureus: (Build-)Depends on OpenJDK 7

2017-08-08 Thread Emmanuel Bourg
On 08/08/2017 06:44 PM, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote: > 1.5 years later this hasn't changed, shall we now drop it? Actually there has been a change since upstream has cleared the license issues we raised. I still intend to update the package, but I don't mind if it has to go through the NEW queue. Em

Bug#793492: Bug#814176: azureus: (Build-)Depends on OpenJDK 7

2017-08-08 Thread Mykola Nikishov
Markus Koschany writes: > For future readers: If someone is interested in reintroducing and > maintaining Azureus, just ask for sponsorship on > debian-j...@lists.debian.org. Seems it is better to check BiglyBT [1] instead: Two long-time developers of the Vuze BitTorrent client, formerly

Bug#793492: Bug#814176: azureus: (Build-)Depends on OpenJDK 7

2017-08-08 Thread Markus Koschany
On 08/08/17 12:44, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote: [...] 1.5 years later this hasn't changed, shall we now drop it? Hi, no objections from my side. I believe there is no point in keeping it anymore. For future readers: If someone is interested in reintroducing and maintaining Azureus, just ask for

Bug#793492: Bug#814176: azureus: (Build-)Depends on OpenJDK 7

2017-08-08 Thread Moritz Mühlenhoff
On Wed, Mar 09, 2016 at 09:10:50PM +0100, Markus Koschany wrote: > Am 09.03.2016 um 20:53 schrieb Stephen Nelson: > > > > On Wed, Mar 9, 2016 at 4:03 PM Markus Koschany > > wrote: > > > > > > This issue is fixed in Git but Stephen Nelson wanted to ask upstream for >

Bug#793492: Bug#814176: azureus: (Build-)Depends on OpenJDK 7

2016-03-09 Thread Markus Koschany
Am 09.03.2016 um 20:53 schrieb Stephen Nelson: > > On Wed, Mar 9, 2016 at 4:03 PM Markus Koschany > wrote: > > > This issue is fixed in Git but Stephen Nelson wanted to ask upstream for > some license clarifications. Unfortunately we haven't heard back from >

Bug#793492: Bug#814176: azureus: (Build-)Depends on OpenJDK 7

2016-03-09 Thread Stephen Nelson
On Wed, Mar 9, 2016 at 4:03 PM Markus Koschany wrote: > > This issue is fixed in Git but Stephen Nelson wanted to ask upstream for > some license clarifications. Unfortunately we haven't heard back from > him since August 2015. > > https://lists.debian.org/debian-java/2015/08/msg00029.html > > H

Bug#793492: azureus: (Build-)Depends on OpenJDK 7

2016-03-09 Thread Markus Koschany
Control: tags -1 confirmed On Mon, 08 Feb 2016 20:27:40 + Matthias Klose wrote: > Package: src:azureus > Version: 4.3.0.6-5 > Severity: serious > User: debian-j...@lists.debian.org > Usertags: openjdk-8-transition > > The package build-depends or depends one an openjdk-7-* package, > which i

Bug#793492:

2015-07-28 Thread Stephen Nelson
I had updated Vuze to 5.3 [1] but there were some outstanding questions over the copyright of source files. I raised this with upstream and they took a while to clarify it and I lost the momentum a bit. I'd still like to get it back into Debian so I'll import the latest version and try to get it d

Bug#793492: Should this package be removed?

2015-07-24 Thread Emmanuel Bourg
Le 24/07/2015 17:30, Moritz Muehlenhoff a écrit : > The version of azureus currently in the archive has been uploaded > in 2009 and it many upstream releases behind. It has been dropped > from testing back in 2013 and the last upload was in 2011. Since > there's apparently no current maintenance i

Bug#793492: Should this package be removed?

2015-07-24 Thread Moritz Muehlenhoff
Package: azureus Severity: serious The version of azureus currently in the archive has been uploaded in 2009 and it many upstream releases behind. It has been dropped from testing back in 2013 and the last upload was in 2011. Since there's apparently no current maintenance interest in Vuze/Azureus