Hi!
On Thu, 2015-07-23 at 10:36:33 +0200, Harald Dunkel wrote:
> On 07/22/15 15:19, Guillem Jover wrote:
> >>
> >> If dpkg is unreliable, then what are the package signatures good for?
> >
> > I'm not sure which package signatures you're talking about. But, no, this
> > is very old “expected” beh
Hi Guillem,
On 07/22/15 15:19, Guillem Jover wrote:
>>
>> If dpkg is unreliable, then what are the package signatures good for?
>
> I'm not sure which package signatures you're talking about. But, no, this
> is very old “expected” behavior, it's documented both in the dpkg FAQ:
>
I can assure y
Control: forcemerge 406715 -1
Control: severity -1 wishlist
Hi!
On Wed, 2015-07-22 at 09:27:14 +0200, Harald Dunkel wrote:
> Package: dpkg
> Version: 1.16.16
>
> gcc-multilib (4:4.7.2-1, amd64) provides a symbolic link for
> /usr/include/asm
> On some Wheezy hosts in my net /usr/include/asm is
Package: dpkg
Version: 1.16.16
gcc-multilib (4:4.7.2-1, amd64) provides a symbolic link for
/usr/include/asm
# dpkg --contents /var/cache/apt/archives/gcc-multilib_4%3a4.7.2-1_amd64.deb
drwxr-xr-x root/root 0 2012-09-27 02:02 ./
drwxr-xr-x root/root 0 2012-09-27 02:02 ./usr/
drwxr
4 matches
Mail list logo