> Am Mittwoch, den 08.07.2015, 06:45 -0500 schrieb Bálint Réczey:
>> In my interpretation of [2] this is enough if both packages contain
>> the same file while it is not our case.
>> IMO 7.6.2 applies here where the Conflicts: is needed, too.
>> I have pushed what would work IMO.
I'd suggest to me
On Wed, Jul 8, 2015 at 12:45 PM, Bálint Réczey wrote:
> You mean you agree with asking for binNMU for x264 or you want to tell
> them something different?
> In my testing x264 got fixed by a simple rebuild.
I double-checked with dak on coccia.d.o, and yes, that should be enough.
--
Alessio Tre
Am Mittwoch, den 08.07.2015, 06:45 -0500 schrieb Bálint Réczey:
> In my interpretation of [2] this is enough if both packages contain
> the same file while it is not our case.
> IMO 7.6.2 applies here where the Conflicts: is needed, too.
> I have pushed what would work IMO.
Conflicts only apply if
2015-07-08 13:12 GMT+02:00 Alessio Treglia :
> On Wed, Jul 8, 2015 at 12:00 PM, Alessio Treglia wrote:
>> On Wed, Jul 8, 2015 at 11:54 AM, Bálint Réczey
>> wrote:
>>> I think it is case 7.6.2 of [2] since the the files are not the same.
>>> The library has been moved to the multiarch location.
>
I started a build here [1], please have a look at the result.
[1]
http://debomatic-amd64.debian.net/distribution#unstable/gpac/0.5.2-426-gc5ad4e4+dfsg5-1/
--
Alessio Treglia | www.alessiotreglia.com
Debian Developer | ales...@debian.org
Ubuntu Core Developer| quadris..
On Wed, Jul 8, 2015 at 12:00 PM, Alessio Treglia wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 8, 2015 at 11:54 AM, Bálint Réczey wrote:
>> I think it is case 7.6.2 of [2] since the the files are not the same.
>> The library has been moved to the multiarch location.
Mmmno, wait, don't use Conflicts. Instead I suggest to
2015-07-08 13:00 GMT+02:00 Alessio Treglia :
> On Wed, Jul 8, 2015 at 11:54 AM, Bálint Réczey wrote:
>> I think it is case 7.6.2 of [2] since the the files are not the same.
>> The library has been moved to the multiarch location.
>
> Which package do you want to force-remove?
The broken libgpac3
On Wed, Jul 8, 2015 at 11:54 AM, Bálint Réczey wrote:
> I think it is case 7.6.2 of [2] since the the files are not the same.
> The library has been moved to the multiarch location.
Which package do you want to force-remove?
--
Alessio Treglia | www.alessiotreglia.com
Debian Developer
2015-07-08 12:45 GMT+02:00 Bálint Réczey :
> 2015-07-08 12:36 GMT+02:00 Alessio Treglia :
>> On Wed, Jul 8, 2015 at 9:43 AM, Bálint Réczey wrote:
>>> Ideally we should have started a proper transition, but since the
>>> reverse dependencies (x264) already gets broken when it is upgraded I
>>> sugg
2015-07-08 12:36 GMT+02:00 Alessio Treglia :
> On Wed, Jul 8, 2015 at 9:43 AM, Bálint Réczey wrote:
>> Ideally we should have started a proper transition, but since the
>> reverse dependencies (x264) already gets broken when it is upgraded I
>> suggest uploading the fixed package to unstable. I ho
On Wed, Jul 8, 2015 at 9:43 AM, Bálint Réczey wrote:
> Ideally we should have started a proper transition, but since the
> reverse dependencies (x264) already gets broken when it is upgraded I
> suggest uploading the fixed package to unstable. I hope the package
> passes NEW fast.
It doesn't look
2015-07-08 10:43 GMT+02:00 Bálint Réczey :
> Hi Alessio,
>
> 2015-07-07 17:31 GMT+02:00 Bálint Réczey :
>> Hi Alessio,
>>
>> 2015-07-06 19:35 GMT-05:00 Alessio Treglia :
>>> Hello Balint,
>>>
>>> On Sun, Jul 5, 2015 at 5:29 PM, djcj wrote:
Package: gpac
Version: 0.5.2-426-gc5ad4e4~dfsg4-
Hi Alessio,
2015-07-07 17:31 GMT+02:00 Bálint Réczey :
> Hi Alessio,
>
> 2015-07-06 19:35 GMT-05:00 Alessio Treglia :
>> Hello Balint,
>>
>> On Sun, Jul 5, 2015 at 5:29 PM, djcj wrote:
>>> Package: gpac
>>> Version: 0.5.2-426-gc5ad4e4~dfsg4-1
>>>
>>> The package libgpac3 should be renamed to libg
Hi Alessio,
2015-07-06 19:35 GMT-05:00 Alessio Treglia :
> Hello Balint,
>
> On Sun, Jul 5, 2015 at 5:29 PM, djcj wrote:
>> Package: gpac
>> Version: 0.5.2-426-gc5ad4e4~dfsg4-1
>>
>> The package libgpac3 should be renamed to libgpac4.
>
I need a few days because I'm traveling right now.
There are
Hello Balint,
On Sun, Jul 5, 2015 at 5:29 PM, djcj wrote:
> Package: gpac
> Version: 0.5.2-426-gc5ad4e4~dfsg4-1
>
> The package libgpac3 should be renamed to libgpac4.
Would you please fix this?
--
Alessio Treglia | www.alessiotreglia.com
Debian Developer | ales...@debian.
Package: gpac
Version: 0.5.2-426-gc5ad4e4~dfsg4-1
The package libgpac3 should be renamed to libgpac4.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
16 matches
Mail list logo
