Bug#791046: getfem++ and GCC 5 transition

2015-08-23 Thread Anton Gladky
I would then propose only to upload the so-name change with the current version to fix the transition issue. The newer 5.0 version can go to experimental to properly check all rdepends. Anton 2015-08-23 22:14 GMT+02:00 Scott Howard : > On Sun, Aug 23, 2015 at 3:58 PM, Anton Gladky wrote: >> Hi

Bug#791046: getfem++ and GCC 5 transition

2015-08-23 Thread Scott Howard
On Sun, Aug 23, 2015 at 3:58 PM, Anton Gladky wrote: > Hi Scott, > > thanks for the pushing it. > I think there is no need to upload it into experimental, let`s > upload it directly into unstable. The only problem is that > there is already a newer version of getfem than in our git, 5.0. > So I do

Bug#791046: getfem++ and GCC 5 transition

2015-08-23 Thread Anton Gladky
Hi Scott, thanks for the pushing it. I think there is no need to upload it into experimental, let`s upload it directly into unstable. The only problem is that there is already a newer version of getfem than in our git, 5.0. So I do not think there is a need to push the previous svn-version. Regar

Bug#791046: getfem++ and GCC 5 transition

2015-08-23 Thread Scott Howard
user release.debian@packages.debian.org usertag 791046 + transition block 791046 by 790756 reassign 791046 release.debian.org thanks I have prepared a team upload to experimental using the previously posted patch. http://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/debian-science/packages/getfem.git This is part o