Bug#790509: libmpfi-dev: transitional package uninstallable

2015-07-02 Thread Vincent Lefevre
On 2015-07-02 12:42:32 +0200, Andreas Beckmann wrote: > I think the general consensus is to have more unversioned -dev packages > to ease transitions, since in most cases a binNMU will be sufficient to > pick up the dependency on the new SONAME. > Even historically versioned ones have transitioned

Bug#790509: libmpfi-dev: transitional package uninstallable

2015-07-02 Thread Andreas Beckmann
On 2015-07-02 11:11, Vincent Lefevre wrote: > On 2015-06-30 01:31:38 +0200, Jerome BENOIT wrote: >> On 30/06/15 00:38, Andreas Beckmann wrote: >>> PS: Is it really necessary to switch from an unversioned -dev package >>> to a versioned one? >> >> For consistency ? > > I'm not sure, but this will h

Bug#790509: libmpfi-dev: transitional package uninstallable

2015-07-02 Thread Vincent Lefevre
On 2015-06-30 01:31:38 +0200, Jerome BENOIT wrote: > On 30/06/15 00:38, Andreas Beckmann wrote: > > PS: Is it really necessary to switch from an unversioned -dev package > > to a versioned one? > > For consistency ? I'm not sure, but this will have the drawback that packages which depend or build

Bug#790509: libmpfi-dev: transitional package uninstallable

2015-06-29 Thread Jerome BENOIT
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello Andreas, thanks for your report and your fix. On 30/06/15 00:38, Andreas Beckmann wrote: > Package: libmpfi-dev > Version: 1.5.1+ds-1 > Severity: grave > Tags: sid > Justification: renders package unusable > User: debian...@lists.debian.org > U

Bug#790509: libmpfi-dev: transitional package uninstallable

2015-06-29 Thread Andreas Beckmann
Package: libmpfi-dev Version: 1.5.1+ds-1 Severity: grave Tags: sid Justification: renders package unusable User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: piuparts Hi, during a test with piuparts I noticed your package is no longer installable in sid: The following packages have unmet dependencies: