On Sat, 04 Jul 2015 00:29:35 +0100, Chris Lamb wrote:
> > the attached patch was already applied as part of the -2 upload, fixing
> > #778575 and making libparse-recdescent-perl itself reproducible.
> > Did you mean to send a different patch?
> No; for some reason our tools were not showing this p
> the attached patch was already applied as part of the -2 upload, fixing
> #778575 and making libparse-recdescent-perl itself reproducible.
>
> Did you mean to send a different patch?
No; for some reason our tools were not showing this patch despite it
(seemingly) being usertagged correctly.
Ap
Hi Chris,
On Sun, Jun 28, 2015 at 11:09:49PM +0100, Chris Lamb wrote:
> Source: libparse-recdescent-perl
> Version: 1.967009+dfsg-2
> While working on the "reproducible builds" effort [1], we have noticed
> that libparse-recdescent-perl generates non-reproducible output.
>
> The attached patch
Source: libparse-recdescent-perl
Version: 1.967009+dfsg-2
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
User: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: randomness
X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Hi,
While working on the "reproducible builds" effort [1], we have noticed
that
4 matches
Mail list logo
