Hi Andrii, Paolo, all,
Just wanted to ask how the work is going? Do you need support?
Thanks and all the best,
Georg
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Hi Paolo,
I'm going to prepare and upload 0.8.14 (both master and slave) based
on the old git repositories asap. This is to assure that if it's not
possible to prepare 0.9.x for stretch then we'll at least have the
last of the previous major version thus we'll won't break the people's
setup badly.
Hi and thanks for the suggestion.
While I wait for my *-guest account to join collab-main and somebody to
pick up the RFP for RAMLfications I have noticed that:
- upstream has renamed the buildslave component "worker", also on pypi:
https://pypi.python.org/pypi/buildbot-worker
- the upstream git
Hi Paolo,
I think collab-maint is the right place for it. Also, what did you use
as an upstream source? Was it pip URL or the repo on github? I think
we should move to the github repo because buildbot-www package is
already a build artifact produced by build procedures from github
repo. That's whe
Control: retitle 790241 please package 0.9.1
I have given it a try, and found that it requires RAMLfications (see the
RFP: https://bugs.debian.org/843882)
For buildbot, I have set up a local git repo using the git-buildpackage
branch / tag standard (the VCS link pointed to by tracker.d.o is not
c
5 matches
Mail list logo
