Bug#790158: [Pkg-sugar-devel] Bug#790158: Upstream comment

2017-10-16 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
Quoting James Cameron (2017-10-16 11:30:55) > On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 10:20:16AM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > > Quoting James Cameron (2017-10-16 07:03:24) > > > Upstream could bring python-rsvg source into the code base; would that > > > be okay? > > > > No. > > > > The team in Debian famil

Bug#790158: [Pkg-sugar-devel] Bug#790158: Upstream comment

2017-10-16 Thread James Cameron
On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 10:20:16AM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > Quoting James Cameron (2017-10-16 07:03:24) > > Upstream could bring python-rsvg source into the code base; would that > > be okay? > > No. > > The team in Debian familiar with librsvg decides that its end of life is > reached.

Bug#790158: [Pkg-sugar-devel] Bug#790158: Upstream comment

2017-10-16 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
Quoting James Cameron (2017-10-16 07:03:24) > Upstream could bring python-rsvg source into the code base; would that > be okay? No. The team in Debian familiar with librsvg decides that its end of life is reached. I will not be comfortable with sidestepping that decision by essentially taking

Bug#790158: Upstream comment

2017-10-15 Thread James Cameron
Upstream could bring python-rsvg source into the code base; would that be okay? Porting from python-rsvg to gir1.2-rsvg-2.0 would also require porting to GTK+ 2 GObject introspection. This would break compatibility with downloaded Sugar activities. -- James Cameron http://quozl.netrek.org/