Bug#789699: vulture review

2015-08-26 Thread Daniel Stender
On Wed, 26 Aug 2015 22:18:02 +0200 Daniel Stender wrote: > On Tue, 25 Aug 2015 19:32:16 +0200 Daniel Stender > wrote: > For the name of binaries, I would prefer "vulture{,3}" over > "python{,3}-vulture" like Pylint does > it, but it appears Pybuild expects this ... does it? ... but in the end

Bug#789699: vulture review

2015-08-26 Thread Daniel Stender
On Tue, 25 Aug 2015 19:32:16 +0200 Daniel Stender wrote: > On 25.08.2015 19:17, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: > ... yeah, this would be an option, Py3 as default is coming up, anyway. > > This is going to be an enhancement for Prospector, which is on Py2, but I > think it runs Vulture > as an ap

Bug#789699: vulture review

2015-08-25 Thread Daniel Stender
On 25.08.2015 19:17, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: > Control: owner -1 ! > > Hi Daniel, I would appreciate if you could provide the python3 package, or > both. > > What do you think? according to setup.py the package is python3 ready, so > maybe > running pybuild --with python3, or providing two

Bug#789699: vulture review

2015-08-25 Thread Gianfranco Costamagna
Control: owner -1 ! Hi Daniel, I would appreciate if you could provide the python3 package, or both. What do you think? according to setup.py the package is python3 ready, so maybe running pybuild --with python3, or providing two packages might be good. what do you think?