Hi,
On 11/02/2015 10:14 AM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
On 02/11/15 10:03, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
On Sun, 1 Nov 2015 11:19:16 +0100 Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
wrote:
ocaml just went in after llvm got fixed and removing a few packages
With the ocaml transition finished in sid+testing, someone
On 02/11/15 10:03, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> On Sun, 1 Nov 2015 11:19:16 +0100 Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
> wrote:
>> ocaml just went in after llvm got fixed and removing a few packages
>
> With the ocaml transition finished in sid+testing, someone should take
> care of the ocaml packages in experime
On Sun, 1 Nov 2015 11:19:16 +0100 Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
wrote:
> ocaml just went in after llvm got fixed and removing a few packages
With the ocaml transition finished in sid+testing, someone should take
care of the ocaml packages in experimental, since these needs binNMUs, too.
Affected source
Control: tags -1 confirmed
On 05/10/15 10:39, Stéphane Glondu wrote:
> Le 30/09/2015 19:21, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort a écrit :
>>> Now that gcc-5 migrated, can anyone give an ETA for the OCaml transition?
>>
>> Has the situation improved wrt the last status update? Can you give an
>> update?
>
> p
Le 30/09/2015 19:21, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort a écrit :
>> Now that gcc-5 migrated, can anyone give an ETA for the OCaml transition?
>
> Has the situation improved wrt the last status update? Can you give an update?
plplot has been removed from testing. No other improvements, but I
believe we can p
On 07/09/15 17:45, Stéphane Glondu wrote:
> Now that gcc-5 migrated, can anyone give an ETA for the OCaml transition?
Has the situation improved wrt the last status update? Can you give an update?
Cheers,
Emilio
Now that gcc-5 migrated, can anyone give an ETA for the OCaml transition?
Cheers,
--
Stéphane
7 matches
Mail list logo
