Matthias Klose wrote:
> adding patches for openjdk-7 without addressing the upstream maintenance issue
> isn't going to help. Neither openjdk-8 nor openjdk-9 build in Debian either.
Actually this underscores the urgency to fix it now, where only a 2-line
diff is needed to fix the FTBFS on kfreebs
Hi,
Matthias Klose wrote:
> adding patches for openjdk-7 without addressing the upstream maintenance issue
> isn't going to help. Neither openjdk-8 nor openjdk-9 build in Debian either.
I agree, but openjdk-7 migration is stalled, and only because:
* the bug was filed against an arch: all pack
Control: severity -1 important
adding patches for openjdk-7 without addressing the upstream maintenance issue
isn't going to help. Neither openjdk-8 nor openjdk-9 build in Debian either.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trou
severity 788982 serious
thanks
Hi,
> openjdk-7 FTBFS on kfreebsd since 7u79-2.5.5-1:
> |
> /«PKGBUILDDIR»/build/openjdk-boot/hotspot/agent/src/os/linux/libproc.h:41:26:
> fatal error: linux/ptrace.h: No such file or directory
> | #include
> | ^
Although a FTBFS on k
Package: src:openjdk-7
Version: 7u79-2.5.5-1
Severity: important
Tags: patch
User: debian-...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: kfreebsd
Hi,
openjdk-7 FTBFS on kfreebsd since 7u79-2.5.5-1:
| /«PKGBUILDDIR»/build/openjdk-boot/hotspot/agent/src/os/linux/libproc.h:41:26:
fatal error: linux/ptrace.h: No su
5 matches
Mail list logo