On 01/10/2018 11:03 PM, Daniel M. Weeks wrote:
> On Wed, 8 Nov 2017 05:00:50 -0600 Richard Laager wrote:
>> I recommend *against* enabling ATOM support.
I retract the above statement. Sorry for the noise.
I must have been thinking of a different driver. Driver 22 (REFID "PPS")
in ntpd/refclock_at
On Wed, 8 Nov 2017 05:00:50 -0600 Richard Laager wrote:
> I recommend *against* enabling ATOM support.
>
> It is much better to use SHM to talk to gpsd. Here are a whole bunch of
> details:
> http://www.catb.org/gpsd/gpsd-time-service-howto.html
>
Richard,
There is nothing in that document tha
I recommend *against* enabling ATOM support.
It is much better to use SHM to talk to gpsd. Here are a whole bunch of
details:
http://www.catb.org/gpsd/gpsd-time-service-howto.html
--
Richard
On Sun, 17 Jan 2016 13:21:18 +0900 Hideki Yamane
wrote:
On Sat, 16 Jan 2016 14:51:44 +0100
Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> Maybe the point is that PPS is currently not supported, and that's
> really all that needs to be fixed?
It's better to support if it doesn't have any side effect, IMHO.
And I don't
On Sat, 16 Jan 2016 14:51:44 +0100
Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> Maybe the point is that PPS is currently not supported, and that's
> really all that needs to be fixed?
It's better to support if it doesn't have any side effect, IMHO.
And I don't have any idea for it, it's good to ask upstream developers
On Sat, Jan 16, 2016 at 10:19:45PM +0900, Hideki Yamane wrote:
> On Sat, 16 Jan 2016 13:34:42 +0100
> Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> > Are you sure that this is actually needed and that it just isn't
> > disabled by default in some derived distribution?
>
> It seems that ATOM driver is necessary for PPS.
On Sat, 16 Jan 2016 13:34:42 +0100
Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> Are you sure that this is actually needed and that it just isn't
> disabled by default in some derived distribution?
It seems that ATOM driver is necessary for PPS.
see http://www.ntp.org/ntpfaq/NTP-s-config-adv.htm#AEN3845
There's no di
On Sat, Jan 16, 2016 at 09:18:23PM +0900, Hideki Yamane wrote:
> Control: tags -1 +patch
>
> Hi,
>
> Is there any reason to not enable atom driver support by default?
> Several raspi users do rebuild ntp to enable it to build Stratum-1 server,
> so release it with this feature is handy for the
Control: tags -1 +patch
Hi,
Is there any reason to not enable atom driver support by default?
Several raspi users do rebuild ntp to enable it to build Stratum-1 server,
so release it with this feature is handy for them.
--
Regards,
Hideki Yamane henrich @ debian.or.jp/org
http://wiki
Package: ntp
Version: 1:4.2.6.p5+dfsg-7
Severity: normal
When trying to use the atom driver, the following error appears:
May 18 23:32:52 neo ntpd[12749]: refclock_newpeer: clock type 22 invalid
May 18 23:32:52 neo ntpd[12749]: 127.127.22.1 interface 127.0.0.1 -> (none)
This means that atom su
10 matches
Mail list logo
