fixed 784009 gnutls28/3.3.15-5
thanks
We can probably close this bug now. We should at least get the fixed version
right so the package can migrate.
--
Magnus Holmgrenholmg...@debian.org
Debian Developer
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
torsdagen den 14 maj 2015 07.56.56 skrev Andreas Metzler:
> On 2015-05-10 Magnus Holmgren wrote:
> > måndagen den 4 maj 2015 19.32.52 skrev Andreas Metzler:
> [...]
>
> >> I think GnuTLS being listed as part of the guile-1.8 removal is an
> >> error in the reporting script, GnuTLS has moved to
On 2015-05-10 Magnus Holmgren wrote:
> måndagen den 4 maj 2015 19.32.52 skrev Andreas Metzler:
[...]
>> I think GnuTLS being listed as part of the guile-1.8 removal is an
>> error in the reporting script, GnuTLS has moved to guile-2.0 in 2013.
>> OTOH I hope we can have gnutls linked against net
måndagen den 4 maj 2015 19.32.52 skrev Andreas Metzler:
> On 2015-05-03 Magnus Holmgren wrote:
> > lördagen den 2 maj 2015 17.47.21 skrev Andreas Metzler:
> > > On 2015-05-02 Niels Möller wrote:
> [...]
>
> >> /I/ think that would help, afaict we would need to either package a
> >> nettle-2.7
On 2015-05-06 Niels Möller wrote:
> Andreas Metzler writes:
>> No, that does not work. wget would be looking for unversioned
>> references to nettle-symbols, and given the choice ot two differently
>> versioned ones it will not prefer either over the other.
> I see. So for a really smooth transi
Andreas Metzler writes:
> No, that does not work. wget would be looking for unversioned
> references to nettle-symbols, and given the choice ot two differently
> versioned ones it will not prefer either over the other.
I see. So for a really smooth transition from jessie and up, including
partia
On 2015-05-03 Niels Möller wrote:
[...]
> Now, it's still a bit unclear to me how versioned symbols really work.
> Is it still necessary to relink the wget executable? Or will the
> combination of
> * Current wget package, linking to gnutls and libnettle4.so,
> * a new gnutls package, linking to
On 2015-05-03 Magnus Holmgren wrote:
> lördagen den 2 maj 2015 17.47.21 skrev Andreas Metzler:
> > On 2015-05-02 Niels Möller wrote:
[...]
>> /I/ think that would help, afaict we would need to either package a
>> nettle-2.7 with versioned symbols or patch Debian's version.
> Not sure how this s
Magnus Holmgren writes:
> Not sure how this situation is normally handled, but when Nettle 3.1 is
> uploaded to sid, new versions of GnuTLS and other packages linking against it
> should follow soon after [1], so the problem is temporary.
As I understand it, the problem is applications like wg
lördagen den 2 maj 2015 17.47.21 skrev Andreas Metzler:
> On 2015-05-02 Niels Möller wrote:
> > Andreas Metzler writes:
> >> Looks like we need a two-step transition: nettle 2.7 -> nettle
> >> 2.7+versioned_symbols , nettle 2.7+versioned_symbols -> nettle 3.1.
> >
> > I'm considering making a n
On 2015-05-02 Niels Möller wrote:
> Andreas Metzler writes:
>> Looks like we need a two-step transition: nettle 2.7 -> nettle
>> 2.7+versioned_symbols , nettle 2.7+versioned_symbols -> nettle 3.1.
> I'm considering making a nettle-2.7.2 release with version symbols. The
> version string would s
Andreas Metzler writes:
> Looks like we need a two-step transition: nettle 2.7 -> nettle
> 2.7+versioned_symbols , nettle 2.7+versioned_symbols -> nettle 3.1.
I'm considering making a nettle-2.7.2 release with version symbols. The
version string would simply be derived from the version in the so
retitle 784009 [experimental] Lack of versioned symbols in nettle causes
segfault
severity 784009 serious
thanks
On 2015-05-02 積丹尼 Dan Jacobson wrote:
> Package: wget
> Version: 1.16.3-2
> Severity: grave
> $ wget
> Segmentation fault
Hello,
thanks for the report. wget links both directly and
Package: wget
Version: 1.16.3-2
Severity: grave
$ wget
Segmentation fault
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
14 matches
Mail list logo
