On Sun, 2015-05-03 at 13:10 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Sun, 2015-05-03 at 08:35 +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > On Sun, 2015-05-03 at 00:40 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > > On Sat, 2015-05-02 at 20:09 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > > > On Sat, 2015-05-02 at 16:35 +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
>
On Sun, 2015-05-03 at 08:35 +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Sun, 2015-05-03 at 00:40 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > On Sat, 2015-05-02 at 20:09 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > > On Sat, 2015-05-02 at 16:35 +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > [...]
> > > > Essentially if Boot-Device is set then Boot-*-P
On Sat, 2015-05-02 at 20:09 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > It seems that the code which handles the Boot-Device case is buggy in
> > the face of a firmware partition which has some hierarchy to it.
>
> If the boot images need to be in a specific subdirectory then it's not
> so unreasonable to exp
On Sun, 2015-05-03 at 00:40 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Sat, 2015-05-02 at 20:09 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > On Sat, 2015-05-02 at 16:35 +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> [...]
> > > Essentially if Boot-Device is set then Boot-*-Path should be relative to
> > > that device, if Boot-Device is no
On Sat, 2015-05-02 at 20:09 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Sat, 2015-05-02 at 16:35 +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
[...]
> > Essentially if Boot-Device is set then Boot-*-Path should be relative to
> > that device, if Boot-Device is not set then Boot-*-Path are relative
> > to /.
> >
> > I think /de
On Sat, 2015-05-02 at 16:35 +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> (CCing Nobuhiro who contributed the flash-kernel db entry for this
> device)
>
> On Sat, 2015-05-02 at 15:40 +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > On Sun, 2015-04-26 at 00:39 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > > On Sat, 25 Apr 2015 23:39:44 +0100 Ben
(CCing Nobuhiro who contributed the flash-kernel db entry for this
device)
On Sat, 2015-05-02 at 15:40 +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Sun, 2015-04-26 at 00:39 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > On Sat, 25 Apr 2015 23:39:44 +0100 Ben Hutchings
> > wrote:
> > > Secondly, if the installation uses LVM
On Sun, 2015-04-26 at 00:39 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Sat, 25 Apr 2015 23:39:44 +0100 Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > Secondly, if the installation uses LVM, /dev/sda1 is the /boot
> > partition, not the root partition. After fixing the first problem,
> > flash-kernel fails like this:
>
> Actual
On Sat, 25 Apr 2015 23:39:44 +0100 Ben Hutchings wrote:
> Secondly, if the installation uses LVM, /dev/sda1 is the /boot
> partition, not the root partition. After fixing the first problem,
> flash-kernel fails like this:
Actually, this doesn't depend on LVM. The installer always creates a
sepa
Package: flash-kernel
Version: 3.35
Severity: important
flash-kernel has this entry for the OpenBlocks AX3-4:
Machine: PlatHome OpenBlocks AX3-4 board
Kernel-Flavors: armmp
DTB-Id: armada-xp-openblocks-ax3-4.dtb
DTB-Append: yes
U-Boot-Kernel-Address: 0x200
U-Boot-Kerne
10 matches
Mail list logo