On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 11:34:36PM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> On Apr 28, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
>
> > - Acpi is a useful command-line tool to easily read values of things
> So basically you are saying that it is common use case is laptops with
> no good management GUI.
No. I am saying that it
Wouter Verhelst writes:
> On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 10:07:36PM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
>> > I'm not sure, if the "acpi" command line utility is that useful which
>> > would warrant having it installed by default. The attached patch drops
>> > it as well. Incidentally, this was also suggested for
On Apr 28, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> - Acpi is a useful command-line tool to easily read values of things
So basically you are saying that it is common use case is laptops with
no good management GUI.
This is not enough to make it a candidate for magic installation by
hw-detect, but maybe you ca
On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 10:07:36PM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> > I'm not sure, if the "acpi" command line utility is that useful which
> > would warrant having it installed by default. The attached patch drops
> > it as well. Incidentally, this was also suggested for the laptop-task,
> > which sti
Christian PERRIER (2015-04-26):
> Quoting Michael Biebl (bi...@debian.org):
> > Package: hw-detect
> > Version: 1.108
> > Severity: normal
> > Tags: patch
> >
> > Hi!
> >
> > While installing a jessie (GNOME) desktop with the latest RC3 installer,
> > I noticed that we still install acpid and ac
Quoting Michael Biebl (bi...@debian.org):
> Package: hw-detect
> Version: 1.108
> Severity: normal
> Tags: patch
>
> Hi!
>
> While installing a jessie (GNOME) desktop with the latest RC3 installer,
> I noticed that we still install acpid and acpi-support-base.
>
> A while ago, I already filed a
On Apr 25, Bjørn Mork wrote:
> > Indeed they are not needed when systemd is used (but are still required
> > on sysvinit systems).
> Are you sure about this? It was my first reaction as well, but then I
> remembered the troubles I had with logind conflicting with my acpid
> based setup.
Yes: I
Am 25.04.2015 um 22:29 schrieb Bjørn Mork:
> m...@linux.it (Marco d'Itri) writes:
>> On Apr 24, Michael Biebl wrote:
>>
>>> A while ago, I already filed a bug to have acpid and acpi-support-base
>>> removed from tasksel [1], since it duplicates functionality which is
>>> nowadays provided by syste
m...@linux.it (Marco d'Itri) writes:
> On Apr 24, Michael Biebl wrote:
>
>> A while ago, I already filed a bug to have acpid and acpi-support-base
>> removed from tasksel [1], since it duplicates functionality which is
>> nowadays provided by systemd/logind.
> Indeed they are not needed when syste
Control: clone 783247 -1
Control: reassign -1 task-laptop
Control: retitle -1 task-laptop should not recommend acpi
Control: subscribe 783247
Control: subscribe -1
On Apr 24, Michael Biebl wrote:
> A while ago, I already filed a bug to have acpid and acpi-support-base
> removed from tasksel [1],
Package: hw-detect
Version: 1.108
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
Hi!
While installing a jessie (GNOME) desktop with the latest RC3 installer,
I noticed that we still install acpid and acpi-support-base.
A while ago, I already filed a bug to have acpid and acpi-support-base
removed from tasksel [1]
11 matches
Mail list logo
