On Mon, Apr 20, 2015 at 5:29 PM, Charlie Hagedorn
wrote:
> I've had inconsistent Octave seg-faults on several jessie machines that I've
> traced to at least the octave-ltfat package.
> The seg-faults are triggered calls to the Octave function rcond. Installing
> octave-ltfat makes it break, unin
* Charlie Hagedorn [2015-04-20 16:14]:
I agree that there's no obvious way for a subcomponent package to affect a
core-compiled function, but I see this effect on all three machines I have
access to today, all running testing ( vanilla testing install, upgraded
crouton install, upgraded Compu
I agree that there's no obvious way for a subcomponent package to affect a
core-compiled function, but I see this effect on all three machines I have
access to today, all running testing ( vanilla testing install, upgraded
crouton install, upgraded Compute Engine instance) . For the machines where
Control: tags -1 unreproducible moreinfo
* Charlie Hagedorn [2015-04-20 14:29]:
I've had inconsistent Octave seg-faults on several jessie machines that
I've traced to at least the octave-ltfat package. The seg-faults are
triggered calls to the Octave function rcond. Installing octave-ltfat
m
Package: octave-ltfat
Version: 2.0.1-1
Severity: important
Dear Maintainer,
I've had inconsistent Octave seg-faults on several jessie machines that I've
traced to at least the octave-ltfat package. The seg-faults are triggered calls
to the Octave function rcond. Installing octave-ltfat makes it
5 matches
Mail list logo
