package magit
fixed 782538 magit/2.2.2-1
thanks
For some reason, this bug hasn't been closed as it should, so closing it.
I'm waiting for the package to go to testing to go to the dh-elpa
way. Everything is already in the elpa-master branch of the collabmaint
git repository, and should be the new
"Barak A. Pearlmutter" writes:
> On 2 September 2015 at 23:01, Rémi Vanicat wrote:
>> Okay. I will see to import this into the pkg-emacsen stuff this week-end and
>> then to port it to the new elpa stuff.
>
> Can I suggest not letting the perfect be the enemy of the good?
> We could upload a non
On 2 September 2015 at 23:01, Rémi Vanicat wrote:
> Okay. I will see to import this into the pkg-emacsen stuff this week-end and
> then to port it to the new elpa stuff.
Can I suggest not letting the perfect be the enemy of the good?
We could upload a non-dh-elpa version, and when the dh-elpa ver
Okay. I will see to import this into the pkg-emacsen stuff this week-end
and then to port it to the new elpa stuff.
Le mer. 2 sept. 2015 à 20:24, Barak A. Pearlmutter
a écrit :
> Okay.
> The patches are formatted by gbp-pq import/export, so they're in the
> DEP-3 format already.
> But I added so
Okay.
The patches are formatted by gbp-pq import/export, so they're in the
DEP-3 format already.
But I added some text and fields in rewritten history and force-pushed
to the barak-master branch.
Rémi Vanicat writes:
> I should have posted it there previously, but I intended to ask you if
> you want the magit package to be maintained by the new pkg-emacsen
> teams[1]. In this case it should use the new, simpler (but very
> experimental) elpa-* packaging style instead of the old emacs-commo
Timo Juhani Lindfors writes:
> Timo Juhani Lindfors writes:
>> Sorry I mean DEP-9, like this:
>
> No, I really mean DEP-3.. :) http://dep.debian.net/deps/dep3/
I should have posted it there previously, but I intended to ask you if
you want the magit package to be maintained by the new pkg-emacs
Timo Juhani Lindfors writes:
> Sorry I mean DEP-9, like this:
No, I really mean DEP-3.. :) http://dep.debian.net/deps/dep3/
-Timo
Timo Juhani Lindfors writes:
> Thanks. Could you use DEP-5 syntax for debian/patches/*? In particular
Sorry I mean DEP-9, like this:
http://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/collab-maint/magit.git/tree/debian/patches/bug-718861.patch?id=2ed57a88eec34b781d7fcf91881d3fa5c08ac1ce
-Timo
Hi,
"Barak A. Pearlmutter" writes:
> I did a tentative packaging upstream version 2.2.1 for my own use,
> based of course on the packaging in the collab-maint git repo.
>
> I've taken the liberty of pushing the new upstream tarballs into that
> repo on the upstream & pristine-tar branches, with m
I did a tentative packaging upstream version 2.2.1 for my own use,
based of course on the packaging in the collab-maint git repo.
I've taken the liberty of pushing the new upstream tarballs into that
repo on the upstream & pristine-tar branches, with matching upstream/*
tags.
I also pushed the pa
11 matches
Mail list logo
