On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 05:14:00PM +, Nigel Kukard wrote:
> On 05/27/2015 05:09 PM, Guido Günther wrote:
> > Hi,
> > On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 09:11:16AM +0200, Han Boetes Edis GmbH wrote:
> >> Since I still see this problem I searched around a bit: Is this patch the
> >> fix for this problem? P
On 05/27/2015 05:09 PM, Guido Günther wrote:
> Hi,
> On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 09:11:16AM +0200, Han Boetes Edis GmbH wrote:
>> Since I still see this problem I searched around a bit: Is this patch the
>> fix for this problem? Please also check the reply, it mentions one change
>> too much has been
Hi,
On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 09:11:16AM +0200, Han Boetes Edis GmbH wrote:
> Since I still see this problem I searched around a bit: Is this patch the fix
> for this problem? Please also check the reply, it mentions one change too
> much has been made.
>
> https://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-l
Since I still see this problem I searched around a bit: Is this patch the fix
for this problem? Please also check the reply, it mentions one change too much
has been made.
https://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2014-December/msg00304.html
Mit freundlichen Grüßen,
Han Boetes
--
To UNSUBS
4 matches
Mail list logo
