Bug#779559: dpkg-source: Add test dependencies to .dsc

Hey Guillem, Guillem Jover [2016-05-09 3:34 +0200]: > > But I'm not sure at which point the Xs- prefix disappears, nor when the new > > field would become official -- is it necessary to check for it here? Or just > > for 'Testsuite-Triggers'? > > This depends on whether the field has had usage b

Bug#779559: dpkg-source: Add test dependencies to .dsc

Hey! On Sun, 2016-05-01 at 11:43:03 -0500, Martin Pitt wrote: > wow, this took a full year to actually implement, sorry for that. Long > plain rides are sometimes useful :-) Bah, a year is nothing! :) > Guillem Jover [2015-03-10 5:39 +0100]: > > So given all the above, I'd say: > > > > Tests

Bug#779559: dpkg-source: Add test dependencies to .dsc

Hello Guillem, Adam, all, wow, this took a full year to actually implement, sorry for that. Long plain rides are sometimes useful :-) Guillem Jover [2015-03-10 5:39 +0100]: > So given all the above, I'd say: > > Testsuite-Triggers: foo, bar, baz > > from the union of all testsuites test depe

Bug#779559: dpkg-source: Add test dependencies to .dsc

Hey Guillem, Guillem Jover [2015-03-10 5:39 +0100]: > So given all the above, I'd say: > > Testsuite-Triggers: foo, bar, baz > > from the union of all testsuites test depends, minus @ and @builddeps@, > without versions, and with alternatives split (i.e. a simple comma > separated package lis

Bug#779559: dpkg-source: Add test dependencies to .dsc

Hi! On Wed, 2015-03-04 at 11:00:08 +0100, Martin Pitt wrote: > Guillem Jover [2015-03-04 10:42 +0100]: > > Ah, indeed, making it clear that this is strictly not for "dependency" > > purposes, seems better. It just crossed my mind that it might make sense > > to strip the version information from t

Bug#779559: dpkg-source: Add test dependencies to .dsc

On Wed, Mar 04, 2015 at 10:42:15AM +0100, Guillem Jover wrote: > > When I said coalesce any other dependencies I was thinking about the > following situation. Say we have a package with an "autopkgtest" > testsuite with dependencies «foo (>= 1.0), bar», and another "newchecks" > testsuite with dep

Bug#779559: dpkg-source: Add test dependencies to .dsc

Hello Guillem, Guillem Jover [2015-03-04 10:42 +0100]: > Ah, indeed, making it clear that this is strictly not for "dependency" > purposes, seems better. It just crossed my mind that it might make sense > to strip the version information from those dependencies, and only list > package names, but

Bug#779559: dpkg-source: Add test dependencies to .dsc

Hi! On Wed, 2015-03-04 at 10:06:42 +0100, Martin Pitt wrote: > Guillem Jover [2015-03-04 9:57 +0100]: > > But then, the test runners will need to parse the specific test case > > dependencies, as in this case @ is omitted, so we might as well just > > coalesce any other dependencies in the same f

Bug#779559: dpkg-source: Add test dependencies to .dsc

Hey Guillem, Guillem Jover [2015-03-04 9:57 +0100]: > Heh, that reminds me a bit of > . Wow, 2006! :-) > In any case, yeah, this sounds fine. I've conflicting thoughts about > the field name, on one hand Testsuite-Depends (to match the

Bug#779559: dpkg-source: Add test dependencies to .dsc

Hi! On Mon, 2015-03-02 at 11:15:22 +0100, Martin Pitt wrote: > Package: dpkg > Version: 1.17.24 > User: autopkgtest-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org > Usertags: autopkgtest > A simpler idea would be to make dpkg-source -b add a new > XS-Autopkgtest-Depends: header, which aggregates all Depends: line

Bug#779559: dpkg-source: Add test dependencies to .dsc

Package: dpkg Version: 1.17.24 User: autopkgtest-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org Usertags: autopkgtest Hello, Adam and I just discussed how to improve DEP-8 autopkgtest regression detection on uploading packages. Right now we only run tests for reverse binary dependencies of a package that got uplo