On 31 March 2015 at 14:36, Matthias Klose wrote:
> Does your testing goes beyond docker.io? If no, I would claim your testing is
> dubious at best ;) There are certainly still issues, but to me it starts to
> look usable. There are other dubious things like how golang-gotools is built
> in
> D
> The "go" implementation bundled there is not fully-baked. For
> example, using "go get" to download a project didn't bother
> downloading the dependencies like it should, thus causing the build to
> fail really hard with a screen-full of errors.
GCC 5 is not yet released. That's why it is in ex
On 31 March 2015 at 14:10, Matthias Klose wrote:
> There is a deficiency in dh-golang, which doesn't make things verbose at all,
> even when setting DH_VERBOSE=1. You can get more information about invoked
> commands by using -x. Maybe there are more things to pass, but I'm not a
> golang
> main
> Worse yet, I tried building the newly-merged-upstream[1] docker gccgo
> support using it, and the "go build" invocation failed to produce a
> binary at the location specified by "-o", but did so with a zero exit
> code indicating success, which is much more alarming. Even adding
> "-v" to the bu
On 4 March 2015 at 17:54, Tianon Gravi wrote:
> Doesn't the "go" binary support co-installability and use via the
> "-compiler" flag too? How will that play into this proposal?
After spending some time with the gccgo-5 package in experimental
(that now has these alternatives baked in...), I'm ac
On 1 March 2015 at 09:32, Matthias Klose wrote:
> golang-go seems to ship gofmt directly, and handling go via alternatives. Is
> there a specific reason for that? Can we make that consistent? If handling via
> alternatives, then I would suggest some priority change, in that golang maybe
> uses a
Package: golang-go
Tags: stretch
gccgo in experimental (depending on gccgo-5) now provides the commands go-5 and
gofmt-5, and claims to be compatible with Go 1.4.
golang-go seems to ship gofmt directly, and handling go via alternatives. Is
there a specific reason for that? Can we make that consi
7 matches
Mail list logo
