Bug#778598: atop: SIGFPE

2017-01-18 Thread Marc Haber
tags #778598 unreproducible thanks as this is probably fixed but still missing feedback from the original reporter, I am marking this as unreproducible. Greetings Marc

Bug#778598: atop: SIGFPE

2016-12-18 Thread Jakob Haufe
On Sat, 17 Dec 2016 08:49:35 +0100 Marc Haber wrote: > This is probably fixed in experimental for months. Please try again > and report back. I will close this bug by the end of Januar 2017 if no > report is received. I installed 2.2.3-1~exp1 back in August and never experienced this bug since t

Bug#778598: atop: SIGFPE

2016-12-17 Thread Marc Haber
On Sun, Oct 30, 2016 at 07:45:54PM +0100, Marc Haber wrote: > Did you work against experimental atop 2.2.x, or against the outdated > and soon-to-be-replaced atop 1.27 in jessie, stretch or sid? This is probably fixed in experimental for months. Please try again and report back. I will close this

Bug#778598: atop: SIGFPE

2016-10-30 Thread Marc Haber
On Sat, Oct 29, 2016 at 07:36:18PM +0100, Matt wrote: > So I can write either, but which would you prefer? I'm guess the big > refactor / re-write would be harder to push upstream, but since I'm not > the maintainer I couldn't say. I apologize for any wasted work, but there is no record of the iss

Bug#778598: atop: SIGFPE

2016-10-29 Thread Matt
Hi all, So, I've tracked down this bug and what is causing it; in accprocnt() you'll find the following, int acctprocnt(void) { struct stat statacc; /* ** if accounting not supported, skip call */ if (acctfd == -1) return 0; /* ** determine how many processes exit