Hi,
On Mon, 09 Feb 2015 01:40:21 +0100, jre wrote:
> On Sun, 8 Feb 2015 21:27:57 +0100 Stephen Kitt wrote:
> > On Sun, 08 Feb 2015 16:05:47 +0100, jre wrote:
> > > libwine-development 1.7.35-2 from experimental does not depend on
> > > libxml2. All other versions seem to be ok though.
> > >
>
Hi Stephen
On Sun, 8 Feb 2015 21:27:57 +0100 Stephen Kitt wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sun, 08 Feb 2015 16:05:47 +0100, jre wrote:
> > libwine-development 1.7.35-2 from experimental does not depend on
> > libxml2. All other versions seem to be ok though.
> >
> > When I rebuild it locally with gbp the d
Hi,
On Sun, 08 Feb 2015 16:05:47 +0100, jre wrote:
> libwine-development 1.7.35-2 from experimental does not depend on
> libxml2. All other versions seem to be ok though.
>
> When I rebuild it locally with gbp the dependency is there again.
> Looking at debian/control.in and the last changes I w
Package: libwine-development
Version: 1.7.35-2
Severity: normal
Hi
libwine-development 1.7.35-2 from experimental does not depend on
libxml2. All other versions seem to be ok though.
When I rebuild it locally with gbp the dependency is there again.
Looking at debian/control.in and the last chan
4 matches
Mail list logo