On 17 February 2015 at 09:26, Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
> Thanks for your work and sorry for not getting back to you sooner. The
> patch
> looks okay. Please go ahead and upload 0.21.1-3 to Jessie and notify us as
> soon as it gets accepted.
>
Ok, it has been uploaded and accepted
https://packages.qa
Tags: + confirmed
On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 09:49:34PM +1100, Russell Sim
wrote:
> On 11 February 2015 at 23:24, Russell Sim wrote:
>
> > On 9 February 2015 at 09:36, Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
> >
> >> I'm afraid we cannot accept 0.21.3-1.1 in Jessie because the changes are
> >> quite large. Can you
On 11 February 2015 at 23:24, Russell Sim wrote:
> On 9 February 2015 at 09:36, Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
>
>> I'm afraid we cannot accept 0.21.3-1.1 in Jessie because the changes are
>> quite large. Can you please prepare an upload targetting jessie based on
>> 0.21.1-2.1?
>>
>
>
> Thanks for looking
On 9 February 2015 at 09:36, Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
> I'm afraid we cannot accept 0.21.3-1.1 in Jessie because the changes are
> quite large. Can you please prepare an upload targetting jessie based on
> 0.21.1-2.1?
>
Thanks for looking at this. I have created a patch that backport the
relevant c
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
Hi,
Le 2015-02-02 11:34, Russell Sim a écrit :
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package libgit2
The newer version of the libgit2 package fixes a security hole [0].
Sorry I real
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package libgit2
The newer version of the libgit2 package fixes a security hole [0].
Sorry I realise that this is the second unblock request for this
package. But at the tim
6 matches
Mail list logo
