On Sun, 08. Feb 22:11 Ivo De Decker wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sat, Jan 31, 2015 at 07:00:28PM +0100, Markus Koschany wrote:
> > Ok. Makes sense. I understand that only a minority of users is affected
> > by that. If you think it's not worth including, so be it. I thought the
> > change was trivial enoug
On 31.01.2015 18:47, Julien Cristau wrote:
[...]
> I don't think kluding this is worth it. The only reasonable way to
> avoid something like this (for next time) is to have versioned symbols
> in libraries (libmikmod in this case).
>
> Cheers,
> Julien
Ok. Makes sense. I understand that only a m
On Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 22:06:53 +0100, Markus Koschany wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: unblock
>
>
> Dear release team,
>
> Please unblock package tecnoballz.
>
> It was discovered [1] that tecnoballz' dependen
unblock tecnoballz/0.93.1-4
Unfortunately I missed that the new dependency was unsatisfiable on
arm64 and ppc64el hence another update was required. Please find
attached the new debdiff for tecnoballz.
Regards,
Markus
diff -Nru tecnoballz-0.93.1/debian/changelog tecnoballz-0.93.1/debian/chang
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Dear release team,
Please unblock package tecnoballz.
It was discovered [1] that tecnoballz' dependency on libsdl-mixer1.2
was not strict enough. This could lead to a situation where user
5 matches
Mail list logo
