On Wed, 2015-01-28 at 18:38 +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> dann frazier (2015-01-28):
> > On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 06:10:49PM +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> > > I was about to push it but you apparently already did; adjusting tags
> > > accordingly.
> >
> > Cool, thanks :) Do you +1 me uploading
dann frazier (2015-01-28):
> On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 06:10:49PM +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> > I was about to push it but you apparently already did; adjusting tags
> > accordingly.
>
> Cool, thanks :) Do you +1 me uploading this? If so, should I request an
> unblock or does that need to come
On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 06:10:49PM +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> dann frazier (2015-01-28):
> > Package: libdebian-installer4
> > Version: 0.98
> > Severity: serious
> > Tags: d-i patch
> >
> > The map_hardware[] table in src/system/subarch-arm-linux.c is no longer NULL
> > terminated. I believ
Control: tag -1 - d-i + pending
dann frazier (2015-01-28):
> Package: libdebian-installer4
> Version: 0.98
> Severity: serious
> Tags: d-i patch
>
> The map_hardware[] table in src/system/subarch-arm-linux.c is no longer NULL
> terminated. I believe this could lead to a segfault on armel/armhf p
Package: libdebian-installer4
Version: 0.98
Severity: serious
Tags: d-i patch
The map_hardware[] table in src/system/subarch-arm-linux.c is no longer NULL
terminated. I believe this could lead to a segfault on armel/armhf platforms,
resulting in a failed install.
This bug was introduced back in v
5 matches
Mail list logo
