Bug#776191: Update licensing description in xxd.c

James - > Hi Bram, > > There was recently some discussion[0] about the licensing of xxd. The > result of which was Jürgen clarifying[1] that it should be dual-licensed > under MIT-X11 and GPL-2 (or later). > > [0]: https://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2015/01/msg00033.html > [1]: https://list

Bug#776191: Update licensing description in xxd.c

Hi Bram, There was recently some discussion[0] about the licensing of xxd. The result of which was Jürgen clarifying[1] that it should be dual-licensed under MIT-X11 and GPL-2 (or later). [0]: https://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2015/01/msg00033.html [1]: https://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/