Am 27.01.2015 um 16:02 schrieb Christian Seiler:
> Am 27.01.2015 um 15:39 schrieb Michael Biebl:
>> Am 27.01.2015 um 13:07 schrieb Christian Seiler:
>>> Am 27.01.2015 um 06:19 schrieb Michael Biebl:
- Drop $remote_fs from the open-isci LSB header and replace it with
$local_fs. That looks
Am 27.01.2015 um 16:42 schrieb Ritesh Raj Sarraf:
> On 01/27/2015 08:09 PM, Michael Biebl wrote:
>>> As I said before: that breaks sysvinit systems with /usr on NFS.
>> How likely is such a setup? I.e. using /usr-on-NFS + openisci in
>> combination. Has anyone actually ever tested this?
>>
>
> The
On 01/27/2015 08:09 PM, Michael Biebl wrote:
>> As I said before: that breaks sysvinit systems with /usr on NFS.
> How likely is such a setup? I.e. using /usr-on-NFS + openisci in
> combination. Has anyone actually ever tested this?
>
There is no real data to show. But one uses remote storage for
Am 27.01.2015 um 15:39 schrieb Michael Biebl:
> Am 27.01.2015 um 13:07 schrieb Christian Seiler:
>> Am 27.01.2015 um 06:19 schrieb Michael Biebl:
>>> - Drop $remote_fs from the open-isci LSB header and replace it with
>>> $local_fs. That looks wrong anyway.
>>
>> As I said before: that breaks sysvi
Am 27.01.2015 um 13:07 schrieb Christian Seiler:
> Am 27.01.2015 um 06:19 schrieb Michael Biebl:
>>> Of course, if you have a better idea of how to do this?
>>
>> Aside from shipping real native unit files, that's probably the least
>> invasive change:
>>
>> - Drop $remote_fs from the open-isci LSB
Am 27.01.2015 um 06:19 schrieb Michael Biebl:
>> Of course, if you have a better idea of how to do this?
>
> Aside from shipping real native unit files, that's probably the least
> invasive change:
>
> - Drop $remote_fs from the open-isci LSB header and replace it with
> $local_fs. That looks wro
Am 26.01.2015 um 17:00 schrieb Christian Seiler:
> Of course, if you have a better idea of how to do this?
Aside from shipping real native unit files, that's probably the least
invasive change:
- Drop $remote_fs from the open-isci LSB header and replace it with
$local_fs. That looks wrong anyway
On 01/26/2015 07:54 PM, Michael Biebl wrote:
>> unblock open-iscsi/2.0.873+git0.3b4b4500-4
> That patch doesn't look right.
>
> Calling systemctl from an init script is a big no-go.
>
> Second, shipping a generated unit file which does run /etc/init.d/foo is
> a hack at best.
>
> I'd be really u
8 matches
Mail list logo
