On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 08:12:51PM +, Colin Watson wrote:
>On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 04:24:24PM +, Steve McIntyre wrote:
>> On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 03:17:39PM +, Colin Watson wrote:
>> >This all looks reasonable enough, but why not "return is_64_kernel () ?
>> >64 : 32;" here? Then you c
On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 04:24:24PM +, Steve McIntyre wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 03:17:39PM +, Colin Watson wrote:
> >This all looks reasonable enough, but why not "return is_64_kernel () ?
> >64 : 32;" here? Then you could simplify
> >grub_install_get_default_x86_platform to just con
On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 04:24:24PM +, Steve McIntyre wrote:
>>
>>This all looks reasonable enough, but why not "return is_64_kernel () ?
>>64 : 32;" here? Then you could simplify
>>grub_install_get_default_x86_platform to just conditionalise on "if
>>(read_platform_size () == 64)" and avoid du
On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 03:17:39PM +, Colin Watson wrote:
>On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 03:03:30PM +, Steve McIntyre wrote:
>> I've got a patch accepted for the kernel to expose the size of the
>> underlying UEFI firmware for x86, and Ben's happy to take it for the
>> Debian kernel (#775191). I'
On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 03:03:30PM +, Steve McIntyre wrote:
> I've got a patch accepted for the kernel to expose the size of the
> underlying UEFI firmware for x86, and Ben's happy to take it for the
> Debian kernel (#775191). I've written and tested a grub patch to match
> (see http://blog.ein
Package: src:grub2
Severity: important
Tags: patch
Hi folks,
I've got a patch accepted for the kernel to expose the size of the
underlying UEFI firmware for x86, and Ben's happy to take it for the
Debian kernel (#775191). I've written and tested a grub patch to match
(see http://blog.einval.com/2
6 matches
Mail list logo
