On Sat, Jan 10, 2015 at 07:53:51PM +0100, Helmut Grohne wrote:
> I am attaching a patch that adds the cached value for arm64. From a
> quick glance it seems or1k isn't covered either.
Now really, thanks Christoph for asking.
Helmut
diff -Nru libsigsegv-2.10/debian/changelog libsigsegv-2.10/debian
On Sat, Jan 10, 2015 at 11:37:09PM +, peter green wrote:
> Can you confirm that FTCBFS stands for "fails to cross build from source"?
I do.
> However I would expect that either way the release team will consider this
> something that should be dealt with post-jessie.
I did not mean to imply
Note: not wearing any partciular hat in this message, opinions are my own.
Helmut Grohne wrote:
Package: src:libsigsegv
Version: 2.10-4
Tags: patch
User: helm...@debian.org
Usertags: rebootstrap
libsigsegv FTCBFS for arm64.
Can you confirm that FTCBFS stands for "fails to cross build from sou
Package: src:libsigsegv
Version: 2.10-4
Tags: patch
User: helm...@debian.org
Usertags: rebootstrap
libsigsegv FTCBFS for arm64. The configure script fails to determine the
stack direction. The general way of determining stack direction in
libsigsegv is to have a long list of cpu names to look up t
4 matches
Mail list logo
