Bug#773205: libatomic-ops-dev: FTBFS on mips64el

2016-11-03 Thread Tobias Hansen
Hi Ian, the response on the upstream bug report looks like it could take a while with the new release. With regard to the upcoming freeze, could you please apply the patches so that the package can migrate to testing? Best, Tobias On Tue, 1 Nov 2016 11:23:19 +1100 Ian Wienand wrote: > I'm sorry

Bug#773205: libatomic-ops-dev: FTBFS on mips64el

2016-10-31 Thread Ian Wienand
I'm sorry about this. I must have misread the history of that branch My preference is to be in sync with upstream, so I have asked if we can get this in a 7.4.5 release [1] If no response, or not possible, I'll add these back in Thanks, -i [1] https://github.com/ivmai/libatomic_ops/issues/20

Bug#773205: libatomic-ops-dev: FTBFS on mips64el

2016-10-28 Thread James Cowgill
Control: found -1 7.4.4-1 Control: severity -1 serious Hi, In 7.4.4-1 the patches adding mips64el support were removed from the package. While they've applied upstream in the 'master' branch not all of them were applied to the 'release-7_4' branch and libatomic-ops FTBFS on mips64el again. These

Bug#773205: libatomic-ops-dev: FTBFS on mips64el

2015-04-27 Thread James Cowgill
Hi, Now that jessie's been released, please can you update libatomic-ops to a version with the mips64el patches in. This is needed to build make (through guile-2.0 -> libgc -> libatomic-ops) and thus is quite important for the port. Merged pull request: https://github.com/ivmai/libatomic_ops/pull

Bug#773205: libatomic-ops-dev: FTBFS on mips64el

2015-01-08 Thread James Cowgill
Control: clone -1 -2 -3 Control: reassign -2 libgc 1:7.2d-6.4 Control: retitle -2 libgc: update libatomic-ops for mips64el Control: reassign -3 gauche 0.9.4-5 Control: retitle -3 gauche: update libatomic-ops for mips64el Control: block -2 by -1 Control: block -3 by -1 Control: forwarded -1 https://

Bug#773205: libatomic-ops-dev: FTBFS on mips64el

2014-12-16 Thread James Cowgill
Hi, There was a small mistake in the previous patch so here's a new one. The only change is to remove the include of '../loadstore/acquire_release_volatile.h' because in most mips64 processors, use of volatile variables does not have acquire/release semantics. I also don't think that this is an a

Bug#773205: libatomic-ops-dev: FTBFS on mips64el

2014-12-15 Thread James Cowgill
Package: libatomic-ops-dev Version: 7.4.2-1 Severity: important Tags: upstream patch Hi, libatomic-ops FTBFS on mips64el due to the testsuite hanging. The code in the mips specific header assumes that sizeof(AO_t) == 4, which isn't the case on mips64el which is 64-bits. I've attached a patch to