On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 11:09:10PM +0100, Niels Thykier wrote:
> Hi Bill,
>
> Just to make it clear:
>
> * You seem to be making the case that we have lost the ability to
>produce (truly) LSB compliant binaries and the tech-ctte were not
>fully informed about the true scope of the conseq
On 2015-03-17 09:34, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> On 16/03/15 23:09, Niels Thykier wrote:
>> - Mind you, as I understand Simon (in his response to my mail), we
>> seem to already have lost that ability in 2007 when we stopped
>> shipping glib2.12.
>
> Actually I understand his m
On 16/03/15 23:09, Niels Thykier wrote:
- Mind you, as I understand Simon (in his response to my mail), we
seem to already have lost that ability in 2007 when we stopped
shipping glib2.12.
Actually I understand his message to say the opposite. GLib 2.42 is API and ABI
compatibl
Hi Bill,
Just to make it clear:
* You seem to be making the case that we have lost the ability to
produce (truly) LSB compliant binaries and the tech-ctte were not
fully informed about the true scope of the consequences of their
resolution.
- If you feel they were uninformed, then p
Niels Thykier wrote:
> On 2015-03-14 14:12, Bill Allombert wrote:
>> IJG libjpeg62 has been in Debian for more than 15 years.
>> IJG libjpeg62 is still required for building LSB packages. Without
>> it, jessie will not be usable for building LSB packages.
>
> You mean to say that [...] libjpeg62-tu
On Sat, Mar 14, 2015 at 04:58:37PM +0100, Niels Thykier wrote:
> On 2015-03-14 14:12, Bill Allombert wrote:
> > On Sat, Mar 14, 2015 at 11:22:17AM +0100, Niels Thykier wrote:
> >> On 2015-02-23 17:49, Niels Thykier wrote:
> >>> Control: tags -1 wontfix
> >>>
> >>> [...]
> >>>
> >>> As debated in #7
On 2015-03-14 14:12, Bill Allombert wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 14, 2015 at 11:22:17AM +0100, Niels Thykier wrote:
>> On 2015-02-23 17:49, Niels Thykier wrote:
>>> Control: tags -1 wontfix
>>>
>>> [...]
>>>
>>> As debated in #774737, we will only be shipping with one implementation
>>> of libjpeg, so I am
On Sat, Mar 14, 2015 at 11:22:17AM +0100, Niels Thykier wrote:
> On 2015-02-23 17:49, Niels Thykier wrote:
> > Control: tags -1 wontfix
> >
> > [...]
> >
> > As debated in #774737, we will only be shipping with one implementation
> > of libjpeg, so I am afraid I will have to decline this request.
Control: tags -1 wontfix
On 2014-12-05 23:47, Bill Allombert wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: unblock
>
> Dera release team,
>
> Please unblock package libjpeg6b (and unstuck it from NEW).
>
> libjpeg6b binaries w
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Dera release team,
Please unblock package libjpeg6b (and unstuck it from NEW).
libjpeg6b binaries were hijacked by the libjpeg-turbo source package, but this
have been resolved. So I made
10 matches
Mail list logo
