Bug#771978: [pkg-apparmor] Bug#771978: Patch: apparmor profile for ps

2014-12-13 Thread intrigeri
Hi, parspes wrote (12 Dec 2014 23:54:07 GMT) : > Do we have a consensus upon @sys from tunables/sys? I think so, yes. (I didn't notice it exists initially.) Cheers, -- intrigeri -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Co

Bug#771978: [pkg-apparmor] Bug#771978: Patch: apparmor profile for ps

2014-12-12 Thread parspes
On 12/12/14, intrigeri wrote: >> Not sure how the profile's author managed to have the parser compile it. I still have includes mostly from Wheezy as I was working on profiles and started there. Okay, so I (or someone) need to change the patch as follows: @{PROC}/@{pids}/** r, No /tunables/ke

Bug#771978: [pkg-apparmor] Bug#771978: Patch: apparmor profile for ps

2014-12-12 Thread Seth Arnold
On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 01:46:21PM +0100, intrigeri wrote: > Craig Small wrote (06 Dec 2014 20:46:29 GMT) : > > I have tested this with ps and it seems that all the flags are working > > OK. I couldn't break it with the usual combination of ps options. > > Thanks for testing! Very nice, thanks.

Bug#771978: [pkg-apparmor] Bug#771978: Patch: apparmor profile for ps

2014-12-05 Thread Cameron Norman
On Fri, Dec 5, 2014 at 4:38 PM, Craig Small wrote: > On Fri, Dec 05, 2014 at 04:20:24PM -0800, Cameron Norman wrote: >> You may want to make sure there is not duplication of work with this guy: >> https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/apparmor/2014-December/006896.html > He's the bug submitter. So no

Bug#771978: [pkg-apparmor] Bug#771978: Patch: apparmor profile for ps

2014-12-05 Thread Craig Small
On Fri, Dec 05, 2014 at 04:20:24PM -0800, Cameron Norman wrote: > You may want to make sure there is not duplication of work with this guy: > https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/apparmor/2014-December/006896.html He's the bug submitter. So no duplication. - Craig -- Craig Small (@smallsees) htt

Bug#771978: [pkg-apparmor] Bug#771978: Patch: apparmor profile for ps

2014-12-05 Thread Cameron Norman
Hello, On Fri, Dec 5, 2014 at 3:45 PM, Craig Small wrote: > On Fri, Dec 05, 2014 at 04:42:02PM +0100, intrigeri wrote: >> * reviewed by someone who's knowledgeable about AppArmor, to make >> sure it actually offers some protection and respects various best > Could someone on the list look a

Bug#771978: [pkg-apparmor] Bug#771978: Patch: apparmor profile for ps

2014-12-05 Thread Craig Small
On Fri, Dec 05, 2014 at 04:42:02PM +0100, intrigeri wrote: > * reviewed by someone who's knowledgeable about AppArmor, to make > sure it actually offers some protection and respects various best Could someone on the list look at that for me? The patch is in the bug report. > * tested by so

Bug#771978: [pkg-apparmor] Bug#771978: Patch: apparmor profile for ps

2014-12-05 Thread intrigeri
Hi Craig, Craig Small wrote (04 Dec 2014 09:47:10 GMT) : > On Wed, Dec 03, 2014 at 08:48:08PM -0600, Pat Parson wrote: >> /bin/ps does not have an apparmor profile. >> I have attached an apparmor profile to patch the package. > Except for a basic concept, I'm not familiar with apparmour and Deb