Bug#771503: Remove package web2ldap

2015-06-27 Thread Marc Haber
On Sat, Jun 27, 2015 at 08:34:49PM +, Christoph Kling wrote: > The work of both of you is highly valuable to many people around here > and it would really be a pity if the package was removed from Debian. > Even a late package is better than no package. Please reconsider your > decision, downgr

Bug#771503: Remove package web2ldap

2015-06-27 Thread Christoph Kling
The work of both of you is highly valuable to many people around here and it would really be a pity if the package was removed from Debian. Even a late package is better than no package. Please reconsider your decision, downgrade the severity and keep doing the good job you already have done. K

Bug#771503: Remove package web2ldap

2014-11-30 Thread Michael Ströder
Marc, I hope you understand that this is not meant as personal offense. It's just facing the fact that it's too hard to keep up for the maintainer in the current situation. Ok? Ciao, Michael. smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

Bug#771503: Remove package web2ldap

2014-11-30 Thread Marc Haber
severity #771503 serious thanks Hi, it would have been nice to get in touch with the Debian maintainer of the package first, but if you don't want your package in Debian, that's fine with me. Web2ldap is developed at a fast pace, with new releases every few weeks. In those process, "old" (read:

Bug#771503: Remove package web2ldap

2014-11-30 Thread Michael Ströder
Package: web2ldap Version: 1.1.43~dfsg-1 https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/web2ldap I understand that it's much work to maintain such a package and that Debian maintainers sometimes cannot keep up with development. But for me as upstream author it seems better not to have a Debian package at all th