Am 02.02.2015 um 16:14 schrieb Didier 'OdyX' Raboud:
> Le lundi, 2 février 2015, 14.34:14 Michael Biebl a écrit :
>> To keep the diff smaller, could you change the patch to simply use
>> (…)
>> A more verbose patch header would be great as well.
>> Just add a few sentences that for MM we use runtim
Le lundi, 2 février 2015, 14.34:14 Michael Biebl a écrit :
> To keep the diff smaller, could you change the patch to simply use
> (…)
> A more verbose patch header would be great as well.
> Just add a few sentences that for MM we use runtime detection since we
> want the dbus autostart behaviour on
Hi OdyX,
Am 02.02.2015 um 11:10 schrieb Didier 'OdyX' Raboud:
> Le lundi, 2 février 2015 08.57:02, vous avez écrit :
>> Could you add the patch file to this bug. It seems you forgot to
>> attach it in your previous mail.
>
> Damn. :'(
>
> Here you go.
To keep the diff smaller, could you change
Hi all,
On Mo 02 Feb 2015 11:10:59 CET, Didier 'OdyX' Raboud wrote:
Le lundi, 2 février 2015 08.57:02, vous avez écrit :
Could you add the patch file to this bug. It seems you forgot to
attach it in your previous mail.
Damn. :'(
Here you go.
OdyX
OdyX! The patch works well (at least her
Hi Odyx,
On So 01 Feb 2015 13:45:16 CET, Didier 'OdyX' Raboud wrote:
Control: reassign -1 network-manager 0.9.10.0-5
Control: tags -1 +patch
(St-Cergue [modest] BSP here)
On Tue, 20 Jan 2015 15:13:29 +0100 Michael Biebl wrote:
> I'd rather have NM use a runtime check for systemd (sd_booted(
Control: reassign -1 network-manager 0.9.10.0-5
Control: tags -1 +patch
(St-Cergue [modest] BSP here)
On Tue, 20 Jan 2015 15:13:29 +0100 Michael Biebl wrote:
> > I'd rather have NM use a runtime check for systemd (sd_booted()).
> > All the code still seems to be there [1], it just needs to be
> >
Hi Michael,
On Di 20 Jan 2015 14:50:13 CET, Michael Biebl wrote:
tags: -1 + moreinfo help
All the code still seems to be there [1], it just needs to be changed to
use a runtime check instead of compile time.
Ok. I think I am not involved with that code base enough. Also quite
busy with th
Am 20.01.2015 um 14:50 schrieb Michael Biebl:
> I'd rather have NM use a runtime check for systemd (sd_booted()).
> All the code still seems to be there [1], it just needs to be changed to
> use a runtime check instead of compile time.
>
> I'm inclined to re-assign this to NM.
>
>> I hope we can
tags: -1 + moreinfo help
Am 20.01.2015 um 11:42 schrieb Mike Gabriel:
> Severity: serious
> Justification: GSM modem support will not work out-of-the-box with
> non-systemd setups
>
> Hi,
>
> I see a similar issue about ModemManager not coming up by default via
> network-manager.
>
> The reason
Severity: serious
Justification: GSM modem support will not work out-of-the-box with
non-systemd setups
Hi,
I see a similar issue about ModemManager not coming up by default via
network-manager.
The reason is simple (after staring at mm and nm from jessie and
wheezy for a while):
o
10 matches
Mail list logo
