On Tue, 2015-07-07 at 17:26 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> Earlier today I uploaded version 4.1.1-1~exp1, with some of the changes
> here. I built it once on ext4 and then on xfs, hoping to change
> directory ordering.
>
> A summary of the debbindiff:
>
> 1. timestamps are different on all files i
Earlier today I uploaded version 4.1.1-1~exp1, with some of the changes
here. I built it once on ext4 and then on xfs, hoping to change
directory ordering.
A summary of the debbindiff:
1. timestamps are different on all files in control.tar.gz
2. timestamps are different on many files in data.tar
On Wed, 2015-01-07 at 20:49 +0100, Jérémy Bobbio wrote:
[...]
> With the attached patch, linux can be built reproducibly with the
> current experimental framework. The following changes have been
> introduced since the previous patch:
>
> * Files in the source tarball are added in a stable order.
On Thu, 2015-01-08 at 09:16 +, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Wed, 2015-01-07 at 20:49 +0100, Jérémy Bobbio wrote:
> > > > +@@ -301,7 +301,9 @@ if [ ! -z ${output_file} ]; then
> > > > + if [ -z ${cpio_file} ]; then
> > > > + timestamp=
> > > > + if test -n "$KBUILD_
On Wed, 2015-01-07 at 20:49 +0100, Jérémy Bobbio wrote:
> > > +@@ -301,7 +301,9 @@ if [ ! -z ${output_file} ]; then
> > > + if [ -z ${cpio_file} ]; then
> > > + timestamp=
> > > + if test -n "$KBUILD_BUILD_TIMESTAMP"; then
> > > +-time
Bastian Blank:
> On Mon, Jan 05, 2015 at 06:56:10PM +0100, Jérémy Bobbio wrote:
> > > > > * linux-source: mtimes of many files differ. Would it be ok to just
> > > > >create the tarball with a single timestamp (`tar --mtime=`)?
> > I've used find+touch instead. See attached patch.
>
> Why?
G
On Mon, Jan 05, 2015 at 06:56:10PM +0100, Jérémy Bobbio wrote:
> We are currently experimenting with fixing mtimes in `dh_builddeb`
> instead of requiring a new helper. I have also done my latest
> experiments without `dh_strip_nondeterminism`. The attached patch adds
> the `-n` flag to gzip to com
Control: unblock -1 by 759886
Jérémy Bobbio:
> Bastian Blank:
> > On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 12:46:45AM +0100, Jérémy Bobbio wrote:
> > > The first patch adds call to `dh_strip_nondeterminism` and
> > > `dh_fixmtimes`, both being part of the custom toolchain currently used
> > > for reproducible buil
Bastian Blank:
> On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 12:46:45AM +0100, Jérémy Bobbio wrote:
> > The first patch adds call to `dh_strip_nondeterminism` and
> > `dh_fixmtimes`, both being part of the custom toolchain currently used
> > for reproducible builds. Hence not tagging the bug with “patch” until
> > the
On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 12:46:45AM +0100, Jérémy Bobbio wrote:
> The first patch adds call to `dh_strip_nondeterminism` and
> `dh_fixmtimes`, both being part of the custom toolchain currently used
> for reproducible builds. Hence not tagging the bug with “patch” until
> they are integrated in debhe
Source: linux
Version: 3.16.7-2
Severity: wishlist
User: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: timestamps randomness
Control: block -1 by 759886
Hi!
I have been doing some experimentation on making linux build
reproducibly [1]. With the attached patches, we are down to three binar
11 matches
Mail list logo
