* Guillem Jover , 2014-11-11, 02:23:
BTW Jakub, did you find this in parallel, or simply relied the bug
filed in Launchpad?
The latter; all credit goes to Joshua.
--
Jakub Wilk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Con
Hi!
On Mon, 2014-11-10 at 01:00:56 +1100, Joshua Rogers wrote:
> On 08/11/14 06:47, Guillem Jover wrote:
> > Nicely spotted! And thanks for the report, I've fixed it now locally
> > and it will be included in the next 1.17.x release. I'll be preparing
> > fixed packages for stable too.
> Could y
On 08/11/14 06:47, Guillem Jover wrote:
> Nicely spotted! And thanks for the report, I've fixed it now locally
> and it will be included in the next 1.17.x release. I'll be preparing
> fixed packages for stable too.
Hi Guillem,
Could you provide a patch for this bug via email?
Thanks
--
-- Jo
Control: found -1 1.16.2
Hi!
On Fri, 2014-11-07 at 19:42:29 +0100, Jakub Wilk wrote:
> Package: dpkg
> Version: 1.17.21
> Tags: security
> # dpkg --dry-run -i printfvuln.deb
> dpkg: warning: parsing file '/tmp/dpkg.bgGIF3/control' near line 3 package
> 'printfvuln':
> '%42$d' is not a valid ar
Package: dpkg
Version: 1.17.21
Tags: security
# dpkg --dry-run -i printfvuln.deb
dpkg: warning: parsing file '/tmp/dpkg.bgGIF3/control' near line 3 package
'printfvuln':
'%42$d' is not a valid architecture name: must start with an alphanumeric
*** invalid %N$ use detected ***
Aborted
This was
5 matches
Mail list logo