On 2015-03-23 01:09:33 +0100, Christoph Anton Mitterer wrote:
> Maybe I've missed that since the discussion got quite long, but I don't
> remember that Vincent actually explained what broke (i.e. I know nothing
> that would use LC_CHARMAP or CODPAGE?)... and the others rather just
> complained abou
On Mon, 2015-03-23 at 10:17 +, Colin Watson wrote:
> I disagree with this characterisation.
Well I guess we won't come to an agreement here.
I've had a short glance over the discussion that the IETF WG and
upstream had about the bug you've mentioned, and it seems that both
seemed to think the
On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 01:09:33AM +0100, Christoph Anton Mitterer wrote:
> On Sun, 2015-03-22 at 23:18 +, Colin Watson wrote:
> > Control: tag 765633 wontfix
> Ah it's really a shame... not that the issue is particularly critical,
> but it shows a general problem within Debian why we have so
On Sun, 2015-03-22 at 23:18 +, Colin Watson wrote:
> Control: tag 765633 wontfix
Ah it's really a shame... not that the issue is particularly critical,
but it shows a general problem within Debian why we have so many fields
where no progress is made - and if it it's made some people must just
4 matches
Mail list logo
