On Mon, 20 Oct 2014 07:31:34 -0500
=?iso-8859-1?Q?Juli=E1n_Moreno_Pati=F1o?= wrote:
> Control: severity -1 serious
>
> Hello,
>
> I don't think so, openrc built fine in those arches.
>
> https://buildd.debian.org/status/logs.php?pkg=openrc&arch=armel
> https://buildd.debian.org/status/logs.php?pkg
Control: severity -1 serious
Hello,
I don't think so, openrc built fine in those arches.
https://buildd.debian.org/status/logs.php?pkg=openrc&arch=armel
https://buildd.debian.org/status/logs.php?pkg=openrc&arch=armhf
In the revision 0.12.4+20131230-8 built ok, something in the next revision
0.
Control: severity -1 important
As openrc has never been built on these architectures, technically the
proper severity here is wishlist rather than serious, as the package "needs
porting". For example, systemd does FTBFS on kfreebsd-* too.
In this case, though, this rule feels more like a technic
3 matches
Mail list logo
