On Thu, Oct 02, 2014 at 09:53:54PM +0200, Ondřej Surý wrote:
> It has been removed in 1:1.3.1-4 as I said it would be.
>
> https://tracker.debian.org/news/574328
But libjpeg-turbo is still hijacking libjpeg62 as far as I can see.
I am not sure why the old libjpeg-progs 1:1.3.1-3 binaries are sti
It has been removed in 1:1.3.1-4 as I said it would be.
https://tracker.debian.org/news/574328
O.
On Thu, Oct 2, 2014, at 20:00, Bill Allombert wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 02, 2014 at 07:39:28PM +0200, Santiago Vila wrote:
> > On Wed, 1 Oct 2014, Ondřej Surý wrote:
> >
> > > This should be remedied by
On Thu, Oct 02, 2014 at 07:39:28PM +0200, Santiago Vila wrote:
> On Wed, 1 Oct 2014, Ondřej Surý wrote:
>
> > This should be remedied by src:libjpeg9 providing libjpeg-progs as
> > requested
> > by Bill Allombert, the libjpeg6b/8/9 maintainer.
>
> Ok, is that going to happen anytime soon?
As soo
On Wed, 1 Oct 2014, Ondřej Surý wrote:
> This should be remedied by src:libjpeg9 providing libjpeg-progs as
> requested
> by Bill Allombert, the libjpeg6b/8/9 maintainer.
Ok, is that going to happen anytime soon?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subje
On Thu, Oct 02, 2014 at 02:34:10AM +0200, Santiago Vila wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 01, 2014 at 12:59:50PM +0200, Ondřej Surý wrote:
> > This should be remedied by src:libjpeg9 providing libjpeg-progs as
> > requested
> > by Bill Allombert, the libjpeg6b/8/9 maintainer.
> >
> > If you want to make this a
On Wed, Oct 01, 2014 at 12:59:50PM +0200, Ondřej Surý wrote:
> This should be remedied by src:libjpeg9 providing libjpeg-progs as
> requested
> by Bill Allombert, the libjpeg6b/8/9 maintainer.
>
> If you want to make this a tad bit clearer, you can report bug against
> libjpeg9
> to provide libjpe
Hi Santiago,
On Wed, Oct 1, 2014, at 11:49, Santiago Vila wrote:
> Package: libjpeg-turbo-progs
> Version: 1:1.3.1-4
> Severity: serious
>
> Changelog says:
>
> * Remove dummy libjpeg-progs from libjpeg-turbo
>
> I wonder why is the reason for this.
See https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugrepo
On Wed, Oct 1, 2014 at 11:49:49 +0200, Santiago Vila wrote:
> I'm using severity serious here not because I want to delay the
> release of jessie or I think this package should be removed from the
> distribution, only to prevent the dummy package to disappear from
> testing.
>
Note that since th
Package: libjpeg-turbo-progs
Version: 1:1.3.1-4
Severity: serious
Changelog says:
* Remove dummy libjpeg-progs from libjpeg-turbo
I wonder why is the reason for this.
The result of removing the dummy package is that the user has to
approve the upgrade by hand because there are packages that ar
9 matches
Mail list logo
