Hi
On Mon, 3 Nov 2014 22:26:25 +0100 M G Berberich
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Am Samstag, den 11. Oktober schrieb Michael Biebl:
> > could you please remove your local service file again, add
> > systemd.log_level=debug to the kernel command line, enable verbose udev
> > debug logging via /etc/udev/ude
Hello,
Am Samstag, den 11. Oktober schrieb Michael Biebl:
> could you please remove your local service file again, add
> systemd.log_level=debug to the kernel command line, enable verbose udev
> debug logging via /etc/udev/udev.conf and then after a reboot, attach
> the output of
> journalctl -alb
Am 12.10.2014 um 00:45 schrieb Dimitri John Ledkov:
> On 11 October 2014 20:14, Michael Biebl wrote:
> Actually that dump is very confusing for me to read, but it does have
> timestamps for udev-trigger 2 seconds before data-gentoo, data and
> home mount.
> Then yeah, we need a log of udev events
On 11 October 2014 20:14, Michael Biebl wrote:
> Am 11.10.2014 um 20:58 schrieb Dimitri John Ledkov:
>> So what needs doing? Because to mount btrfs /dev/sdb,
>> systemd-udev-trigger is needed to generate "block" "add" event and
>> thus execute btrfs scan, in the initramfs-less case.
>> And ate the
Am 11.10.2014 um 21:17 schrieb Michael Biebl:
> Please also attach your /etc/fstab and mention which mounts are btrfs
> volumes which are not mounted.
nvm, I just noticed that you already did provide that file in the mean time.
--
Why is it that all of the instruments seeking intelligent life
Hi,
could you please remove your local service file again, add
systemd.log_level=debug to the kernel command line, enable verbose udev
debug logging via /etc/udev/udev.conf and then after a reboot, attach
the output of
journalctl -alb
Please also attach your /etc/fstab and mention which mounts ar
Am 11.10.2014 um 20:58 schrieb Dimitri John Ledkov:
> So what needs doing? Because to mount btrfs /dev/sdb,
> systemd-udev-trigger is needed to generate "block" "add" event and
> thus execute btrfs scan, in the initramfs-less case.
> And ate the moment systemd-udev-trigger is only called after loca
On 11 October 2014 18:09, Michael Biebl wrote:
> Am 11.10.2014 um 18:57 schrieb Dimitri John Ledkov:
>> Can someone from systemd experts say whether or not
>> systemd-udev-trigger is run before local-fs target?
>
> That's not quite how it works.
> local-fs.target is a dynamic target which all the
Am 11.10.2014 um 18:57 schrieb Dimitri John Ledkov:
> Can someone from systemd experts say whether or not
> systemd-udev-trigger is run before local-fs target?
That's not quite how it works.
local-fs.target is a dynamic target which all the mounts in /etc/fstab
hook into.
If you look at "systemctl
Hey all,
On 22 September 2014 18:09, M G Berberich wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Am Montag, den 22. September schrieb Dimitri John Ledkov:
>
>> It is my understanding that udev rules should be sufficient.
>> Could you please provide your /etc/fstab to reproduce this failure to boot?
>> Are you attempting t
Hello,
Am Montag, den 22. September schrieb Dimitri John Ledkov:
> It is my understanding that udev rules should be sufficient.
> Could you please provide your /etc/fstab to reproduce this failure to boot?
> Are you attempting to do initramfs-less boot with rootfs on btrfs?
-
Hello,
Am Montag, den 22. September schrieb Dimitri John Ledkov:
> On 22 September 2014 12:57, Michael Biebl wrote:
> > Am 22.09.2014 um 13:27 schrieb M G Berberich:
> >> Hello,
> >>
> >> Am Montag, den 22. September schrieb Michael Biebl:
> >>> Am 21.09.2014 um 22:04 schrieb M G Berberich:
> >>>
On 22 September 2014 12:57, Michael Biebl wrote:
> Am 22.09.2014 um 13:27 schrieb M G Berberich:
>> Hello,
>>
>> Am Montag, den 22. September schrieb Michael Biebl:
>>> Am 21.09.2014 um 22:04 schrieb M G Berberich:
Package: systemd
Version: 208-8
Severity: normal
Dear Main
Am 22.09.2014 um 13:27 schrieb M G Berberich:
> Hello,
>
> Am Montag, den 22. September schrieb Michael Biebl:
>> Am 21.09.2014 um 22:04 schrieb M G Berberich:
>>> Package: systemd
>>> Version: 208-8
>>> Severity: normal
>>>
>>> Dear Maintainer,
>>>
>>> systemd is not able to boot a system that ha
Hello,
Am Montag, den 22. September schrieb Michael Biebl:
> Am 21.09.2014 um 22:04 schrieb M G Berberich:
> > Package: systemd
> > Version: 208-8
> > Severity: normal
> >
> > Dear Maintainer,
> >
> > systemd is not able to boot a system that has btrfs-volumes in
> > /etc/fstab and does not use
Am 21.09.2014 um 22:04 schrieb M G Berberich:
> Package: systemd
> Version: 208-8
> Severity: normal
>
> Dear Maintainer,
>
> systemd is not able to boot a system that has btrfs-volumes in
> /etc/fstab and does not use a initramfs. That is because ‘btrfs device
> scan’ has to be executed bevor mo
16 matches
Mail list logo