Control: tags -1 -pending
Control: noowner -1
On Sun, 2014-09-21 at 23:41 +0200, Markus Koschany wrote:
> Hello Tobias,
>
> On 21.09.2014 18:26, Tobias Frost wrote:
> > Am Saturday, den 20.09.2014, 17:33 +0200 schrieb Markus Koschany:
> [...]
> >> I said I could duplicate the code but I feel that
Hello Tobias,
On 21.09.2014 18:26, Tobias Frost wrote:
> Am Saturday, den 20.09.2014, 17:33 +0200 schrieb Markus Koschany:
[...]
>> I said I could duplicate the code but I feel that we gain nothing with
>> it since I'm the only one who has to work with those packages.
>
> According d/control thi
Am Saturday, den 20.09.2014, 17:33 +0200 schrieb Markus Koschany:
> On 20.09.2014 15:45, Tobias Frost wrote:
> [...]
> I agree with you that we both waste time here. I still think the comment
> in debian/copyright and the nature of the split would justify a
> "unified" d/copyright file but I inten
On Sun, 2014-09-21 at 03:50 +0300, Peter Pentchev wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 20, 2014 at 10:10:00AM +0200, Christian Kastner wrote:
> > Hi Markus,
> >
> > On 2014-09-20 01:22, Markus Koschany wrote:
> > > The debian/copyright file is identical for ufoai-data, ufoai-music and
> > > ufoai-maps.
> >
> > I
On 20.09.2014 15:45, Tobias Frost wrote:
[...]
> The split is not under dispute. Other packages do that too, for example
> redeclipse. But redeclipse do it "right" (in my view) and their
> generate-copyright-script which is aware of the package it acts on.
> (Your script can be enhanced to do that
Hi Markus,
sorry for taking part of the discussion.
If you think the FTP master position is contraddittory I suggest you to open a
thread in debian-devel with ftpmasters cc'ed.
Anyway in my opinion duplicating the lines is better also because copyright
file is shown in packages.qa.debian.org/pa
On 20.09.2014 16:02, Tobias Frost wrote:
> Addendum:
>
> On Sat, 2014-09-20 at 15:45 +0200, Tobias Frost wrote:
>>> Absolutely agreed. But can you point me to examples where the short
>>> reference to /usr/share/common-licenses was deemed not appropriate by
>>> the FTP team?
>
>
> From
> https:/
Addendum:
On Sat, 2014-09-20 at 15:45 +0200, Tobias Frost wrote:
> > Absolutely agreed. But can you point me to examples where the short
> > reference to /usr/share/common-licenses was deemed not appropriate by
> > the FTP team?
From
https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/03/msg0002
Hallo Markus,
Am Saturday, den 20.09.2014, 13:02 +0200 schrieb Markus Koschany:
> On 20.09.2014 09:57, Tobias Frost wrote:
[...]
> I still don't see why the current copyright file does not meet Debian's
> quality requirements. Instead of one huge 900 MB -data package, the game
> data was simply s
On 20.09.2014 09:57, Tobias Frost wrote:
[...]
>> First of all I'd like to suggest that you start with the ufoai source
>> package first because it contains the ufoai_copyright.py script and
>> other information that are useful to understand the packaging of
>> UFO:AI's data packages.
>
> My reaso
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
On Sat, 2014-09-20 at 01:22 +0200, Markus Koschany wrote:
> Hi Tobias,
>
> thanks for taking your time for this.
>
> On 19.09.2014 23:51, Tobias Frost wrote:
> > Control: -1 moreoinfo
> >
> > Hi Markus,
> >
> > so, let's start with -music
>
> First of all I'd like to
Hi Tobias,
thanks for taking your time for this.
On 19.09.2014 23:51, Tobias Frost wrote:
> Control: -1 moreoinfo
>
> Hi Markus,
>
> so, let's start with -music
First of all I'd like to suggest that you start with the ufoai source
package first because it contains the ufoai_copyright.py script
Control: -1 moreoinfo
Hi Markus,
so, let's start with -music
-> d/copyright contains *many* files not in this package.
Please clean up the file. (Also, please use wildcards;
this makes it far easier to review)
Seems that a "base/" prefix slipped in the -music part of d/copyright?
Nitpick*: It l
13 matches
Mail list logo
