Hi,
[ Replying to the bug. ]
On 11/20/2014 06:27 PM, Don Armstrong wrote:
> On Thu, 20 Nov 2014, Ansgar Burchardt wrote:
>> Don Armstrong writes:
>>> Speaking personally, without specific patches which have been discussed
>>> with the maintainers of the init package and well tested, I'm unlikely
Hi,
Don Armstrong writes:
> Speaking personally, without specific patches which have been discussed
> with the maintainers of the init package and well tested, I'm unlikely
> to vote any resolution on this issue above FD.
Does this include the "no change is required" option? I would prefer if
we
Svante Signell writes:
> 4. For the moment, we invite concrete proposals for technical changes
>which would arrange that 1. new jessie installations using Linux
>would get systemd but 2. existing installations retain their
>existing init system so far as possible.
>
> Solutions exists
On Wed, 19 Nov 2014, Svante Signell wrote:
> 4. For the moment, we invite concrete proposals for technical changes
>which would arrange that 1. new jessie installations using Linux
>would get systemd but 2. existing installations retain their
>existing init system so far as possible.
>
On Wed, 2014-11-19 at 13:51 +0100, Ansgar Burchardt wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I would like to see an end to open questions on systemd in Jessie.
>
> So, given that the GR is over and no technical proposals for not
> switching init systems on upgrade to Jessie have been made, is it
> possible to draw a con
Hi,
I would like to see an end to open questions on systemd in Jessie.
So, given that the GR is over and no technical proposals for not
switching init systems on upgrade to Jessie have been made, is it
possible to draw a conclusion to this issue now? I'm not sure there is
much to gain from waitin
6 matches
Mail list logo
