]] Christian Seiler
> Am 2014-12-04 18:21, schrieb Adam Borowski:
>
> > * some configurations of encrypted lvm
>
> Could you point me to a bug report on this? I'd like to help out with
> that. I have systemd running on my home computer with an encrypted
> LVM, and it does work, so what you are r
Sorry, stupid webmail, sent my email to early...
and only to the mailing list, not the bugtracker... :(
To make sure it's recorded in the bug, and I also added something to
the end:
Am 2014-12-04 19:31, schrieb Christian Seiler:
Am 2014-12-04 18:21, schrieb Adam Borowski:
On Thu, Dec 04, 2014
On Thu, Dec 04, 2014 at 05:25:26PM +0100, Christian Seiler wrote:
> - Switchig depends order of init [1]
>(sysvinit-core before systemd-sysv)
>
> -> won't work, because init is Essential, but systemd-sysv isn't,
>so this change would default the init system to sysvinit for
>
Thanks.
I found this post of your to be really thought-provoking and useful and
an example of the sort of discourse we should strive to when discussing
these issues.
I think the discussion of switching default inits in the future is
something to particularly consider.
--Sam
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, e
Dear ctte,
after having watched this discussion from the sidelines a bit, I'd
like to offer a few thoughts on this topic.
First of all, as for the technical issue of how to NOT cause the init
system to be switched when updating from wheezy to jessie: all
proposed solution I've seen in this threa
On Fri, 19 Sep 2014 09:16:11 -0700 Josh Triplett wrote:
>
> I agree with documenting this: we should have a very clear statement in
> the release notes documenting the new default init system, and stating
> that anyone wishing to continue using sysvinit should install
> sysvinit-core and systemd-s
On Fri, 19 Sep 2014 13:44:43 +0100 Ian Jackson
wrote:
> Package: tech-ctte
>
> At the risk of generating confusion due to a duplication of threads:
On the contrary, thank you for moving this to a separate thread.
I would like to propose that, if the TC addresses this point at all, it
does so s
Paul Hedderly writes ("Re: Bug#762194: Automatic switch to systemd on
wheezy->jessie upgrades"):
> On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 01:44:43PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > My view is that users should not be automatically switched when
> > upgrading to jessie. As I said in my
On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 01:44:43PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> My view is that users should not be automatically switched when
> upgrading to jessie. As I said in my intro to #746578:
>
Just out of interest, had Upstrat been chose as the _default_ init system for
Debian, would you have had the s
Package: tech-ctte
At the risk of generating confusion due to a duplication of threads:
It appears that the answer to #746578 (libpam-systemd dependency) does
not depend on whether users upgrading should be switched to systemd by
default. The current state in jessie is that users are switched by
10 matches
Mail list logo
